Jump to content
DVDVR Message Board

[OCT 2016] WRESTLING DISCUSSION THREAD


RIPPA

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Technico Support said:

Right but it's Prichard's podcast.  Anything that's 1) contrary to anything you've ever heard before and 2) very complimentary to WWE is an absolute fabrication.  He swears Mania 7 was moved due ton security concerns, WWE had Meltzer on the payroll to report nice things about them, and that all WWE attendance figures are 100% accurate.  When called on anything, his only defense is "were YOU in the room?"  It's fun to hear Conrad outright call him on his bullshit, though.

Corny went pretty hard on Prichard RE: Meltzer on this week's podcast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember when it was announced that Diesel and Razor were going back to WCW, loads of internet wrestling analysts of the time were saying it was a waste of WCW's money, because Vinnie Vegas and the Diamond Studd did nothing to move business the first time. So therefore they'd just bomb out again and nobody would care about any of it.

Most of the same people also thought that Bret jumping after Montreal would seal WCW as the MNW winner and kill off the WWF for good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, evilwaldo said:

He was right.  Without the NWO being ex-WWE guys WCW never gets the nationwide attention they received.

Oddly enough, the WWE comeback was cemented by the mid-card guys WCW either let go or cast aside.  Jericho, Foley, Austin, etc.

Hogan would never let guys like Foley, Jericho, and Austin get over him.  Never.  

The history of WCW is such bittersweet irony since the guys cast aside were ultimately the ones responsible for their demise.

 

That night was the first time the WWE reclaimed the Monday Night title in how many weeks never again relinquishing that honor.

Actually the WWF came back a while before that. I was at the Raw in Philly in April '98 when they broke Nitro's win streak. The main event was Austin with one hand tied behind his back vs. Vince, and once Austin's hand was tied Mankind came out and beat him down. Also, Al Snow debuted with his ECW gimmick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know how the Basketball Hall of Fame has inducted journalists before? Any chance the WWE HoF ever inducts the greatest Pro-Wrestling journalist ever? Y'know, Bill Apter?

Or possibly that Meltzer bloke... who is in the one of the other HoF's , and can't rightly induct himself into his own HoF (if he ever passes the torch (Not The Torch Newsletter, the metaphorical torch) or when he eventually passes away, his replacement (if there is one) would induct him into that one right away). Because whilst I could see Vince vetoing something like that, the McMahon-Helmsley fact-gime seems a lot less closed minded about that sort of thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, evilwaldo said:

That night was the first time the WWE reclaimed the Monday Night title in how many weeks never again relinquishing that honor.

Not true, don't fall for the WWE narrative. WCW had already been losing the ratings war weekly starting late 1998.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could someone kindly tell Bret Hart that the Freebirds were one of the biggest draws in the history of the business at their peak in Mid South and World Class? But yeah Demolition are more worthy of being HOF'ers. Riiiiiiiiiiight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, evilwaldo said:

The history of WCW is such bittersweet irony since the guys cast aside were ultimately the ones responsible for their demise.

 

Oh please. The ultimately negative impact of Hogan did way more damage than the midgets jumping ship. The coffin was already shut by then, they were just nails helping keep it closed. Christ Hogan running rampant has been responsible for what, 3 promotions, folding. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The initial angle of Hall & Nash in WCW was as The Outsiders, entirely built upon the perception of them as "still" WWF guys. It started as an invasion angle, not just a heel stable (or faction, as thee kids say now). I agree with many of the posters above - it had to be these two, and it was handled perfectly, even including the Hogan reveal but than it quickly spiraled down, booking- and backstage-wise. The idea of keeping Hogan and the other big players away from legit challengers to get heel heat quickly became an excuse for laziness and getting over as "cool".

- RAF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, BEN! said:

Can you make Godzilla stomp on Suplex City in this new WWE game?  Cause that's like the only thing I want to see involving Brock Lesnar nowadays.

Give me Goldberg vs. Rusev.  Or Styles.  Or The Big Dog.  Fuck a Bork vs. Oldberg match.

Go to Japan, hire the production people to created a Suplex City Kaijū set then have this mofo wreck it with the prerequisite CFO$ remix:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, SorceressKnight said:

Really, it's one or the other: Either Vince McMahon has a point Sting wasn't a "big deal" enough to make a play for him earlier, or Meltzer doesn't have a leg to stand on when you say "Sting wasn't enough of a big deal to merit an Observer Hall of Fame spot".

Dave said and this is pretty much word for word that Sting would have been worth way more to WWE than the $500,000 TNA was paying him and Vince didn't understand that Sting was a big deal some 15 years after WCW closed.

How can Dave say something like that but then claim Sting doesn't belong in the hall of fame? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Da Meltz reported on his audio show last night that WWE is thinking about restructuring the Network into 4 tiers (free, $4.99, $9.99 and $14.99). One of the options would be to vote for the HOF, and watching content from promotions like TNA... and ROH?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bischoff didn't really say that. Hart was brought in to 1) Take him from Vince , 2) Pad out the roster because they were adding Thunder.

There seemed to be some problems caused by the fact that 1) Bret Hart turned up 'late' to tapings, 2) Bret Hart didn't like Bischoff's management style, and 3) Bret Hart was clearly psychologically affected by the Montreal Screw Job. But Bret Hart did actually have a good heel run against guys like Booker T and DDP, which may not be what people expected, but it is pretty much the function he was brought in to serve. I certainly wouldn't have pushed him as a babyface above Sting or Goldberg at that point, and expecting him to replace Hogan as the top heel isn't that realistic - I will admit to being curious about what heel Bret vs face Hogan would have been like, though I'm not overly convinced we had a bunch of classics stolen from us.

Basically the whole 'Bret Hart was under-utilized in WCW' thing is more or less completely wrong.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Niners Fan in CT said:

If Scott Hall comes into WCW and he's doing a Scarface gimmick and Nash is doing a tweener/cool heel deal and they are both singles wrestlers I think it helps WCW but probably doesn't really move the needle much.

Wasn't WWF doing shit business with those guys at the top of their cards? So yeah WCW deserves credit for taking them and making them bigger stars than Vince ever did. They also proved Vince wrong about Hogan being old news as he helped create a second wresting boom with his heel turn. Vince had the right idea, but may have jumped the gun by a few years.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone remember a WWF tag team called the Ring Lords? I saw them only once in a squash in the mid-nineties. They had red facepaint and I believe both of them had long black hair. I've never seen them again, nor heard of them, since, and I can't find any information on them at all. It struck me as strange that you'd have a team with an actual name and some colourful gimmick (or at least facepaint), but they were only shown once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sin Carne said:

Bischoff didn't really say that. Hart was brought in to 1) Take him from Vince , 2) Pad out the roster because they were adding Thunder.

There seemed to be some problems caused by the fact that 1) Bret Hart turned up 'late' to tapings, 2) Bret Hart didn't like Bischoff's management style, and 3) Bret Hart was clearly psychologically affected by the Montreal Screw Job. But Bret Hart did actually have a good heel run against guys like Booker T and DDP, which may not be what people expected, but it is pretty much the function he was brought in to serve. I certainly wouldn't have pushed him as a babyface above Sting or Goldberg at that point, and expecting him to replace Hogan as the top heel isn't that realistic - I will admit to being curious about what heel Bret vs face Hogan would have been like, though I'm not overly convinced we had a bunch of classics stolen from us.

Basically the whole 'Bret Hart was under-utilized in WCW' thing is more or less completely wrong.

 

If Bret had done an assessment of the situation with WCW BEFORE signing then he would've seen that there was honestly no place for him in the upper card in WCW.  Either way, he won the World Title within 2 years of signing and would've likely had a strong 2000 if he hadn't gotten kicked in the head. It's an unfortunate situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Casey said:

Da Meltz reported on his audio show last night that WWE is thinking about restructuring the Network into 4 tiers (free, $4.99, $9.99 and $14.99). One of the options would be to vote for the HOF, and watching content from promotions like TNA... and ROH?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, (BP) said:

It's not like he had a choice beyond signing a new deal with Vince for considerably less after they'd just agreed on the 20-year contract. 

Of course, he was in a terrible situation. 

The biggest problem for Bret was the insistence on continuing the nWo angle beyond Starrcade 1997. If Sting had won the title and then feuded with the "Real World Champion" Bret Hart for a couple of months while Hogan & Savage feuded with Hall & Nash while the nWo imploded, it would've been a great use of Bret and a totally plausible scenario. Bret should've known better than anyone that Hogan's ego wouldn't let him step aside and let another heel have the limelight. Their last interaction in 1993 should've showed Bret that as long as Hogan is there, no one has a shot at moving above him. 

The saddest part is, if Bret had agreed to work for less in the WWF for literally 12-18 months, he could've gotten a pretty big deal. He had no way of knowing that the WWF was about to turn a corner and WCW was about to fall off a cliff. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've gathered from Wrestling With Shadows and Brets book and of course its from Bret's perspective but Bret Originally accepted the 20 year deal and didn't want to leave the WWE(F) but then Vince recanted on the deal claiming he "couldn't afford Bret" and WCW was offering him a three year 9 million dollar deal so he'd be crazy not to sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Roman said:

Does anyone remember a WWF tag team called the Ring Lords? I saw them only once in a squash in the mid-nineties. They had red facepaint and I believe both of them had long black hair. I've never seen them again, nor heard of them, since, and I can't find any information on them at all. It struck me as strange that you'd have a team with an actual name and some colourful gimmick (or at least facepaint), but they were only shown once.

Rick and Speedy?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...