Leaderboard

Dolfan choosing chaos to start the month by mentioning AEW in a "I know just enough about AEW to start a problem" kind of way

As an AEW ride-or-die who has spent years (decades at this point) shitting on WWE here, I just wanna state that to me, the distinction is that even though the quality of AEW's show has slipped a bit over the last 8 months, I don't feel like TK & Co. actively resent me/us as their audience. Are there booking choices I would have made differently if I were in charge? Of course! But very few things aired on AEW TV have ever made me go, 'Is this even f'n wrestling that I'm watching anymore?' in the same way the average WWE broadcast did. In fact, the only time I've ever had anything even approaching that reaction when watching AEW is when something feels 'too WWE' (looking at you, 17 minute four pillars opening promo...) There were times with WWE by the end where it felt like they were literally daring me to stop giving them my time (and HHH came pretty darn close with that 'my friend Mark' promo). In AEW, a bad show is just a bad show; maybe Friday/Saturday/the next Wednesday will be better, maybe not. In WWE, a bad show is representative of a top down, corporate philosophy of 'Content is King!' and 'Fuck 'em, they'll buy it.' I definitely can't and won't speak for anyone else, but personally that's my reasoning for my vitriol toward WWE, and the comparative 'undercriticism' of AEW.

What brings you joy in life, friend?

Hopefully this.

And that was with the Starks mini program along the way too. It probably makes sense to have the champ with 1-2 programs while the challenger gets built up before a PPV, but with Max's deal that he only wrestles a few times a year, that becomes innately hard. BUT, in the face of the whiny bit of bad faith tone in the post above mine, let me be entirely clear that there's still a lot to enjoy on any given Wednesday or Friday (or Thursday, or Tuesday, or Sunday morning). I'm writing up both Sammy vs Darby and Orange vs Bandido tonight for SC and toss a bunch of words at both. It does make me wonder if they wouldn't be better served by 6 PPVs a year and again, if a soft brand split and more Punk influence isn't going to help things just a little. Plus there's been a lot of talk about bringing in a new continuity writer (with a loose rumor that it's Will Washington but that's more of a matter of timing than anything else).

"Being unable to separate one's personal taste from what will work for the masses is what craters so many artistic endeavors", she says as she sadly mopes that Scott Norton and the Barbarian were never World Champions in the United States.

To me, AEW is a hybrid of 1992 WCW and PWG, which is pretty fine by me. Swap PWG for 2004 ROH and it's perfect.

People also don't always take into consideration that a title match can be the literal main event but not the main draw for a PPV. If there is some sort of Blood and Guts BCC vs. Elite type match, that will be the main draw as they've been getting equal TV time the last month in building up to it. But if they don't have a big throwdown between those factions and do lean too heavily on MJF vs. Pillars match I wouldn't think that was a great idea. Its ok to have a B Level defense now and then, all promotions do it, the issue only comes up if the B Level defense is sold/presented as an A defense. A title defense like that just needs a really solid card around it, you can't just throw it out there by itself. I personally don't take gimmick posters seriously, I don't *care* they exist as I'm way too old to care about such things but I'm far more open to listen to/discuss criticism from fans that talk about the good and the bad than the ones that's sole purpose is to talk down something. To each their own, just feels like an odd way to go about Interneting.

You just saved me a lot of time and effort writing basically the same thing, thanks. I'm a huge AEW fan, but I agree with a lot of AK's criticisms, it's just that they're mostly very small fry for me compared to what I like. Jungle Boy and Sammy suck at promos, agreed, but I like watching a company that lets them try and fail. I don't like reading most of what AK says because it makes me feel worse about something I enjoy, but I'm capable of having my opinion challenged. Where it comes across as disingenuous is in how little criticism I see from him towards WWE, and how a lot of his praise of them, and forgive me if I'm conflating this with someone else's take, is that they're good because they're doing record business and are currently very popular with the mainstream wrestling fan. Which, for me, is a bit too close to the 'Ed Sheeran/Coldplay must be great artists because they sell out stadiums and do billions of Spotify listens' school of criticism. It's one thing to deconstruct the issues with AEW and make me question the fact that it's the best weekly TV wrestling show in history, but good luck making a convincing case for current WWE not being mainly a travesty still.

Ain't I a stinker?

I think as far as historical years to base your company around, you could do a lot worse than 1997 WWF. I'm not sure if it's something you could create self-consciously, but it was still a "down period" (for WWE at least), there weren't a host of hot new stars "showing up unexpectedly," and there were definitely huge chunks of it that sucked as bad as anything I've ever watched, but overall it felt really alive and unpredictable in a way that would become more standardized and rote through the boom period of what was properly "The Attitude Era." There was just so much stuff being thrown at the wall, mostly utilizing by-then established WWE guys, that everything felt like it was always on the verge of exploding or going off the rails. Sometimes it was raggedy but it was usually compelling, and the undercard was so, so much weaker than what AEW has to play with right now. I'm not suggesting that the cure for AEW's (relatively minor, I think) woes is to let Sammy Guevara start saying fuck on TV or by going on all in on a Sid/Undertaker-calibre main event and just hope someone magically becomes Stone Cold, but I do think that there's something to be said for kind of messing around a little and making mistakes and seeing if something doesn't just happen to catch fire. It's an advantage AEW has over WWE, so why not use it?

I am sorry that I missed this. This will be entirely too long, so I apologize. Bear in mind, I stopped watching AEW in the first eight months of its existence and have only seen about three shows since then. The last AEW show I saw was the one in Seattle, which I was actually at. Most of what I don't like about AEW is not necessarily AEW's fault. Wrestling as an art form is at a place in 2020 that is different than the place it was at in 1978 or 1984. Some of that is that I have a marked preference for a bunch of hosses doing press slams, and even the big men tend to be go-go-go. When the Giant did a dropkick, that earned a massive pop. Now dudes over 6'6 are doing dives on the regular. But even if you ignore that preference, I think the ante has been upped entirely too much in pro wrestling w/r/t the work itself. My feeling is that you can see the seams way too easily. Some of that is the acknowledgement that everything is a work from the wrestlers themselves, but then again, I can watch an episode of Succession and then watch Sarah Snook talk about what she thinks Siobhan's goals and needs are, and that doesn't bother me. So maybe that's not it, but what is the problem for me is that it comes through in the ring. I don't see Snook practicing her blocking when I watch an episode. I get the illusion that Shiv is Shiv, not someone pretending to be Shiv. This is a person deliberately distancing her husband from her because she doesn't understand how to trust someone enough to love them, not an actor pretending blah blah blah. But when I watch a lot of modern pro wrestling, I can see the seams. I can see how contrived that tower suplex spot is. I can see the hesitation as Wrestler A gets into the right position to catch Wrestler B on an overelaborate dive. I actually think that most of the work today sucks. It's bad pro wrestling. And the issue is not an AEW issue or a WWE issue or anything else; it's an issue of what happens when your work becomes so intricate that you can't risk anything that even looks spontaneous because you're responsible for protecting the other worker. I don't know - you see Bret Hart pop on a ringpost Figure Four, and you don't see that really, it's the guy who is being put in the move who has all that responsibility to keep Bret from banging his head on the floor (thanks for nothing, Goldberg!). But I think the stuff a lot of modern workers do today cuts right through that. I can see the seams. In WWE, last I saw, it was really bad because everything about their house style is so repetitive down to how people enter the ring that nothing feels real or spontaneous. It very much feels like a wrestling if wrestling itself were a theme park. Everything is scheduled down to the second, and if anything happens that's out of order, it'll be quickly corrected by management, or otherwise the CEO's gonna have to come down and start firing people. AEW doesn't feel like that, exactly, but I can see through everything. And again, I think that's just where wrestling evolved to. I blame PWG and all those ladder matches in the Attitude Era and, while I don't blame lucha directly, I blame the influence of lucha on a bunch of guys who like the moves, but who don't know how to do them and also hide the seams. w/r/t AEW specifically, I don't like feuds that rely on shooty shit, I feel like the house style has two modes, generally - bloody brawl and flippy flippy flip shit (yes, that is a reductive POV, so believe me that I know it's just my POV and not a reflection of actual reality), and I struggle with all these young wrestlers they're pushing because I don't believe in any of them as stars. You can go down the line: I don't believe in Sammy, I don't believe in MJF, I don't believe in Darby, I don't believe in Britt, boom, boom, boom. I believe in young, happy-to-be-here Marcus Alexander Bagwell more than I have ever believed in any of the pillars. I am rooting for Ricky Starks personally, but I don't think he actually has it. Combine that with a veteran core that I also don't like , and really, you'd need a whole-ass personnel change to get me into AEW. But again, that's something that comes down to me. Way too much to change there. So I think the thing that I'd need changed for me to come back to AEW are: 1) no more try-hard segments were people cuss because they're on cable, so they can, 2) cut out the shooty stuff completely, 3) something that feels more like a variety show in terms of matches and styles, and 4) while I like good matches for the sake of good matches, I respond well to compelling stories with stakes. YMMV, but I haven't seen a feud yet in AEW that feels that way to me.

I do think there is a place for those who do love old school wrestling with none of that sports entertainment aspect or those who feel their wrestling is still unrepresented. However, people are going to have to accept it's not going to be in front of packed arenas every week (or this day and age, 60-85% filled arenas sometimes scaled down for production reasons) or have the same fervor as the kayfabe days. Here's where I feel Corgan missed the boat. He had a chance to be the solid, entrenched number 3 (especially with ROH's rapid decline) who could have been the fan favorite promotion that wasn't AEW or WWE especially among the old school fans. There was also a wealth of talent out there that wasn't signed to a major promotion yet and needed a place to be seasoned before that and exposure before they go to the big show. He chose to be neither and booked his promotion out of spite against old school fans. You don't need a money mark who has some of the same likes or dislikes when it comes to wrestling. You just need someone who isn't that incompetent or shallow as the above example who doesn't mind that he will lose money or probably barely break even for the sake of good, serious, adequately booked pro wrestling. Problem is there aren't many if any that start a business with the hope of barely breaking even when they already have money to begin with. Moreover, the people who do have the funds don't have the booking/creative experience or the connections to someone who can book or have enough creative experience is extremely small if not non-existent. Tony Khan's safety net may be his VPs, but it appears it doesn't have much effect on the final product. Corgan's was probably Lagana, but once Speaking Out happened, that safety net was gone and you get what you have now.

I think my problem with AEW is that I wanted WCW in 1992 or 1996 or even the promise of what might be in 2001, and I didn't get it. And that's okay! That's a problem with me! But even if it's not for me, there's no reason to make countless posts about how it's obviously failing because it's not what I want. I guess the same is true of WWE for that matter. But man, when some billionaire money mark watches 1992 WCW on Peacock and decides that they want more of that in the 2020s, I'll be there, dammit.

Let me assist you by yelling at the clouds as well: When Tank Davis fought there pre-pandemic, I was so glad that the arena (then still Royal Farms Arena) still looked basically the same way it did when WWF and WCW ran there in the 80s and 90s. It was instantly recognizable. We've had this discussion before here, but I hate it when all the arenas look the same cause it does nothing to help how it looks on TV.

Del Rio is on the Mount Rushmore of wrestlers with presentations so good that people were fooled into thinking they'd be viable main eventers someday.

Like WWE hasn’t had years where they just threw mud against the wall and pushed guys like Jack Swagger or Alberto Del Rio to the title

Just wait until I win Powerball, pal. (Seriously, Watts was certainly out-of-touch in more ways than one, but the in-ring product is so good, and there are so many memorable moments that came from that year, that I think even with Watts making a series of booking mistakes, that's an amazing year aesthetically. But let me revise that to wanting AEW to be 1982 Mid-South or 1984 JCP instead.)

AEW is very watchable even if not compelling and I do appreciate that they are trying to elevate young talent. A lot of eventual main event talents had starts and stops to their eventual rise. Talk to me in three years, not today about the value of giving a jungle boy or guevara a chance in a main event feud. WWEs issue for years has been an overreliance on established main eventers and nostalgia. This is an indictment of NXT. Despite all of the hoopla around the facility, they cannot make anyone. The one person who they are trying to make just looked like Fandango at mania. At least AEW seems to be aware of the fact that there's going to come a day when the current crop of main eventers are gone. And lets not forget that WWE has been basically unwatchable since 2014 which is why the niche for AEW exists in the first place. Almost ten years of pushes to nowhere, very little getting over, and trying to fill the hole John Cena left behind. Does WWE know how to put together a giant event better than just about anyone else in sports or entertainment? Yes, you need to give them that. But then there's the rest of the year.

Yet again, Americans treat a Canadian badly, and then call him standing up for what he believes in a heel turn.

Actually, if WCW in early 2001 ran a Scott Steiner/Billy Kidman/Shane Helms/Lance Storm main event on, like, SuperBrawl or something, that wouldn't have been the worst! It would have been an interesting attempt at finding new main event stars. If this is what it seems to be, which is AEW running a one-PPV angle to put four young guys in the main event, girded by an undercard with the established wrestlers, every company does that at some point. And why not? You have to take shots at some points to see if your potential main eventers really are main event-level talent. Nothing wrong with that from a booking perspective.

Also want to say this: I'm obviously cognizant of the fact that the build to this has been, as the French say, 'the shits' - and I can't argue with you that those guys don't necessarily yet equal 'box office.' But as a counterpoint, let me say this: maybe if WCW rolled the dice and ran a PPV or two in '98 with your Jerichos, Guererros, Malenkos, Mysterios, etc. on top they'd still be around. You're 1000% correct that the execution could have been much, much, MUCH better - but I absolutely cannot, in good conscience, get behind any stance that opposes the idea of building for the future. And as I've mentioned before ad nauseum, this has been SUCH a needed reset/mission statement after the Punk shit.

Double or Nothing is in a few weeks! Watch MJF and Sammy battle to decide who is the more disgusting human being! Woo!

Forget the AEW vs. WWE discussion for a minute. If you haven't watched Stardom All-Star Grand Queendom, go do that. Then get ready for NJPW Best of the Super Juniors 30. Then get ready for NJPW Resurgence in a few weeks.

I will try to be concise when I say what @The Idiot King and @Sparkleface mention kinda go hand and hand. People tend to overrate great wrestling or sometime great booking and believing that it automatically leads to commercial success. WWF 1997 has some stuff that in retrospect that doesn't age well at all and TBH wasn't that great when I watched it originally. WWF in 1998-1999 when the tide of the wrestling war was turning and then the turn of completed has a whole bunch of stuff that doesn't age well. However, if you have 2-3 guys on a team or in a promotion who are averaging the pro wrestling equivalent of 40 points, 25 rebounds, 15 assists with 5 blocks or steals and a 31 +/- everytime they step on the court, whatever happens outside of that is negligible. We're at a point where we're so far removed from what made us love pro wrestling for each specific person that what folks want OR willing to accept as the baseline is going to vastly different with some similarities and overlap. The only clear connecting link is star power. However, based on how this thread started off and whenever you visited various threads on this forum, people have some different definitions and very narrow views on what a star can be. Having lived through the time twenty-five years ago, I can say people did have some of the same viewpoints and talking points on that. At the same time, what helped as time passed was people even if not likeminded were still a bit more open minded. If you already categorized someone and someone pushes that person above that station, you're probably going a bit of bias going forward about the booking. Now people have to basically overperform to meet sometimes unrealistic expectations. "Be entertaining" doesn't sound unrealistic on paper, but if you have different interpretations of what entertainment can be, it can sometimes be unrealistic especially in an era of pro wrestling where the talent came into the business at a much different time (less live events to work out and format their matches, much more censorship, less day-to-day guidance/mentorship, and more and sometimes unnecessary choreography at the behest of creative/producers/road agents)

Yeah, I love the perspective that brand splits are essentially what the territory system was. It's easy to jump from that to "the issue is how poorly WWE always handled brand splits, not the idea of brand splits themselves." I accept that my aesthetic preferences w/r/t pro wrestling are almost completely left unreflected in the modern pro wrestling scene, but that's why old stuff exists. I do miss watching new wrestling, though, especially watching new wrestling that many other people are watching. The communal aspect of watching pro wrestling is half of what makes it fun.

This is one of the issues I had with Brian Last when he thought AEW should have been that in 2019 back when I was still listening to Cornette's two shows. You know the only way that could have happened? It still be the 1980s and more importantly, before Vince's expansion and he didn't have most of the big stars. That's the only way. In 2019, it was silly. In 2023, it's even more ludicrous. Vince (and to be fair, Bischoff for a few years) put running a wrestling promotion far out of reach for the regular person funding a venture like that. On the production side, you cannot do a stripped down production where you basically doing everything off 1-3 cameras. From a visual standpoint, everything is going to be WWE-lite or a even poorer imitation. On the financial side, everyone is going to be on restrictive, guaranteed contracts. AEW at least allows people to work indies through office approval and you can get approval to work with their Mexican partner (AAA depending on when Konnan and TK are on speaking terms) and New Japan. Otherwise, you're not going to have the luxury of having talent swaps and bringing new guys in who are already stars elsewhere. Add in that most of the people you bring in now (even if you get some guy or gal who was on WWE TV for years) aren't going to be the same caliber of stars you had back in the territory days. One of the greater issues no one looks at is fundamentally, a lot of the territories are working off of 10-15 talents as your core. Now that 10-15 is mostly name guys, but that's who you're working around at a given time. Some territories had more, but once you get past 7-10 guys honestly, it's a group of interchangeable talents. Go through your favorite territories and their best or your favorite year of critical/commercial success. Some years are going to be more stacked than others (especially the stronger territories), but most times, it's top heavy than a motherfucker in terms of the roster. In a lot of years/eras, you get where there are some name guys but they aren't in at the exact same time. In an era where most of the non-televised cards are only 7 or 8 matches tops and the TV shows are basically 44-50 minutes of content (not counting Georgia which for a long time was 2 hrs and Memphis being 90 minutes), there is the likelihood that you don't have time to build around 5 or 6 big stars and then have an absolutely loaded roster underneath. If a guy is working Mid-South and Memphis or Mid-South and World Class, he ain't going to really be showing up on Georgia or Mid-Atlantic TV anymore. He's working those towns pretty regularly and showing up on those TV shows. Then, when his time is done, that's it. On to the next. We've had to endure already two going on three months of bitching about a brand split in AEW. As much as I personally don't care about it one way or another (cause I am watching both), people want to see their favorite wrestlers all the time against their other favorite wrestlers. Even though technically, before national expansion and a bunch of places ceased to exist, you were always watching basically brand split pro wrestling. You just didn't give a fuck cause WWF/E didn't have a name for it yet, and you only cared about the show you were able to watch. Also, add in the fact, those two (JCP and Mid-South) weren't on the national level really. So you only have to focus on your principal cities and the few other towns you were running. You weren't really looking to build an audience past that. As long as you had strong penetration in your key markets and a pretty loyal local fanbase, you were good as gold. What happened when they either tried to expand or that "loyal" fanbase went away? I just watched the infamous Dirty White Boy and Tom Prichard hanging from a post/fake domestic abuse angle from Continental this past weekend. For all that was great about it (minus the alleged domestic abuse part), it happened in front of maybe 300 people in an arena. Keep in mind, that's a territory in front of their supposed hardcore fans who only care about that particular brand of wrestling. A year or so later, they were out of business. Vince McMahon made it where you cannot go backwards. People have to get it through their skulls.

I can't believe I let my friend guilt trip me into going to a concert the day of Double or Nothing. But at least I'm going to Dynamite on Wednesday so that's cool. Also, random side note but I went to CFG Arena yesterday for Monster Jam with the nephews so I got a preview of what the arena's like. They redid a lot of things and I honestly fucking hate it. VIP seats and parking for spots that were always open, food and especially drinks are a lot more expensive, and there's no ties look-wise to any of the history the arena had. I know times change and they had to modernize things. But even in past arena names it always had that Baltimore Arena vibe that I adored. Now it's just a place to go to which sucks. Yeah, this is definitely my yelling at clouds moment but I've been there tons of times and have such fond memories. So to see that all wiped away just sucks. But to turn this back around I'm looking forward to seeing Willow live and the four pillars tag match should be fun. I think The Elite are going to appear and I'm already excited to sing along to some Kansas. Arena be damned fun will be had. Add in the fact that I got floor seats for a good price on Stubhub (not facing the camera but who cares) and it's gonna be a good one.

ROTJ came in at #5 for the April 29th-28th box office. Good thing because Disney needs the revenue. We Hate Movies Chris Cabin put forth the argument if it had been the original cut it would've been #1. I maintain if any of the original cuts make it back to theaters they easily would top the BO chart for at least 2-3 weeks James

"Crushing your enemies" feels like the answer that will be given, but there really was nothing wrong with feeling the wind in your hair.

Some video intern at ABC had their things packed and waiting for them when they came into work Monday morning.

I feel that this movie would've only gotten made in today's political climate. Here in the era of anti-wokeness and convenient amnesia is the perfect time for a movie to come around and shove the face of US History in its own bile. I await the social chaos and backlash this movie will bring. I will need to go to the store and buy lots of popcorn.

I love AEW and all, but, man - we’ve spent this many weeks to get to the match that everyone already knew was going to happen. And we still have like like 3 or 4 more weeks of build to go, too. Ugh.

It looks so fucking stupid but him having it on while wearing a shirt with a picture of him wearing it takes if all the way around to sublime. You know Brian Cage is the only dude in that group with a real contract because he was the only one who said "That sucks, I'm not wearing it."

Swerve’s fuzzy ski mask looks like he skinned some kid’s plushie collection and it’s certainly a choice.

I'll go the other way. After everything he's been through -- indies, being ROH's anchor, flailing in NXT -- at the end of his career, Roderick deserves this. A tremendous in-ring talent who never never made the big time because of his size and charisma. Let the guy make his money and receive his accolades now.

That's what the NHL gets for switching to the dumbass white on the road bullshit.

I don't expect better from you cause you're AK. Not exactly a brand known for quality. Given all their resources and genius, why cannot they beat out 10-12 other shows on Fox and their related networks? They got money out the wazoo now. No excuses. Meanwhile, based on what they got, AEW is going to be the top scripted show on TBS/TNT for the next 70 years. On their next TV deal, they're going to get good money for a organization that's only been around not even five years.

You will never go broke appealing to the lowest common denominator

Find me something on Fox airing regularly in prime time that does less than 1-2 million. 9-1-1: 4.5 million for the last show 9-1-1 Lone Star: 3.35 million for the last show The Masked Singer: 3.4 million for the last show Next Level Chef: 1.76 million for the last show Fox is such a strong platform that if WWE did below 1.5-2 million average, they would have to make some creative changes at the top. That has very little to do with AEW and Tony Khan. Why cannot WWE's bad fiction writers who are living out of their fantasy by virtue of Vince's checkbook beat out a shitty reality show and two shows that are basically the same show over two nights?

Looks like there was some good analytical conversation generated on previous pages: will circle back and read through tomorrow. Meanwhile: SD -- absent of Roman -- continues to absolutely smoke it, w/ 2.5 million viewers or +25% YOY. For all the whataboutery re: narrative decisions taken prior to & during WM, it continues to prove as was clearly the case at the time -- the outcome of the ongoing Bloodline saga is to have made a product w/ 6 or 7 bonafide main eventers at the top of the card, each with their own distinctive character and traits who can be rotated in and out of the grander story arc. Not 'hypothetical' main eventers or draws .. guys that 2.5 million people will tune in to watch absent of the number one guy being on the TV set. The creative team at WWE are making guys up and down that card superstars right now at a pace and consistency they haven't for going on 20 years prior. This is building a narrative-laden, story-driven roster with foundations. Venues are selling out for every show; talent are getting intended reactions up and down the card; vets & young guns can be cycled in and out while maintaining narrative flow. So when the contrite question emerges from the echo chamber of "you whine too much: what ever makes you happy?" .. actual quality output like this (& hot shows like WM) make me happy. The industry being reduced to carnival drivel on the other channel while guys with talent like Hobbs & Acclaimed are being blown to smithereens by a talentless fan fiction writer w/ zero governance or quality control living out his fantasy by virtue of his father's check book conversely does nothing for me.

From P&L standpoint, they would more likely be wanting to recreate 94-98 WCW than the previous era. 1990-early 1993 tried so hard to be "we're the real wrestling...not that cartoon bullshit on the other channel" that it alienated what was a potential larger fanbase. The scary reality is that Hulk Hogan was like a prime Reggie Jackson or ARod or 2009 on Kobe Bryant where you should be able to compete for championships for multiple years but good luck unloading that contract and getting rid of the toxicity. I believe there is someone who believes they if they can wrangle John Cena or Batista from Hollywood or siphon off whatever little Bill Goldberg has left, build around that, and go from there similar to what Bischoff did and compete with WWE and now AEW. I don't believe someone who has the necessary capital looks at the transitional era of 1991-1993 and half of 1994 as something that can be replicated and improved upon. The closest amalgamation for better or worse is TK. The next best guy would be some guy working a 9 to 5 who runs an indy on the weekend. That's about it.

I mean....Toronto

Raw and Smackdown's weekly ratings are lower than Nitro was when WCW was sold to McMahon. Mainstream wrestling fan, based on TV viewership, is less than 1% of the adult population of the United States. I know that Peacock skews things and there is a global market, but "record business" has always seemed suspect to me. What I will give WWE credit for is convincing the general audience that they are the only pro wrestling company and managing to make Wrestlemania into a major event that even non-fans are aware of and might even pay money to go for "the spectacle." I'd definitely rather watch a company at least take a chance on elevating it's younger stars instead of having the same champion for 1000 days, fighting the same 3-4 dudes.

Sometimes, it can feel like the “Wrestling General” thread is actually just the WWE General thread, being as AEW has it’s own Monthly thread (and so do the indies/ Puro/ Lucha), but wwe doesn’t. So any WWE discussion that isn’t show specific winds up here. So discussing AEW in Wrestling General is a nice change, is what I’m saying.

If you needed more proof how the Stanley Cup is the most difficult playoffs in sports here we go. Not sure there is a sport where the home crowd is so powerful in energy and so meaningless at the same time

Also...hahaha fuck the Avs

HOLY JESUS CHRIST GODDAMNED SHIT John Hillcoat Will Finally Bring BLOOD MERIDIAN To The Big Screen - Fangoria Prepare to vomit directly on your shoes.

a few things that come to mind 1) Springer's show became more and more of a work over time, like wrestling. Neither was telling you that it was fake upfront though. 2) Jamie Dundee was a talent booker for the Springer show for a time 3) Jerry guest hosted Raw in the 2010s For all the things Russo can be criticized over, he was smart enough or accidentally smart enough to figure out that a Springer fanbase really isn't all that different from a Wrestling fanbase. If there was Cincinnati studio wrestling with Jerry Springer as the host, he probably would have made for a good host of that. Not sure if any wrestling shows ever ended with the host giving final thoughts ala Springer's talk show, but that would be novel enough to get some of the booker's main points of the show across. Also I'm expecting to hear somewhere in the 27 minutes of Cornette that Springer wrote a personal check to a prostitute and that Cincinnati isn't that far away from Louisville. Okay, i'm guessing that it's gonna only be like 24 minutes and there's an ad read at the end.

Death to everything about that Hardy/Firm segment. Eternal life for Lethal vs. Wheeler.