Dolfan in NYC Posted September 11, 2018 Posted September 11, 2018 Last week was easily the most annoying week of football in which my team won. How on god's green earth did DEFENSIVE MATERMIND~~~ Matt Patricia have a rookie drop almost 50 on them. How does Pittsburgh turnover the ball 5 times and not lose. Ugh. So many questions. Fuck the Jets. New England-Jacksonville & Minnesota-Green Bay are the big matchups this week.
Dolfan in NYC Posted September 11, 2018 Author Posted September 11, 2018 Greg Olsen is going to be out for a long ass time. He's got a fractured foot and is being evaluated to see if he'll be placed on IR.
Brian Fowler Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 10 hours ago, Dolfan in NYC said: How on god's green earth did DEFENSIVE MATERMIND~~~ Matt Patricia have a rookie drop almost 50 on them. He's the mastermind of the defense of the only team to ever gain 600 yards and lose. So he probably sucks. But, to be slightly fair, his QBs threw five picks including a touchdown, and a punt was taken to the house. And the two best players on the defense did spend some time hurt during the game. Basically the Lions were awful in all three phases.
Beech27 Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 1) Allen probably could have used the first team reps all camp and preseason, if they were willing to go to him this quick. If they weren't... I mean, there were replacement level quarterbacks available. 2) If Allen busts, it's worth remembering that the Bills were the team Kansas City traded up with in order to get Mahomes. So, they could have had him or Watson for a year already.
Wyld Samurai Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 I can't wait to keep LOL'ing the Raiders.
Elsalvajeloco Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 31 minutes ago, RIPPA said: Josh Allen will start for the Bills So the Bills won't play a QB in week 2. Cool.
Dolfan in NYC Posted September 12, 2018 Author Posted September 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, Beech27 said: 1) Allen probably could have used the first team reps all camp and preseason, if they were willing to go to him this quick. If they weren't... I mean, there were replacement level quarterbacks available. 2) If Allen busts, it's worth remembering that the Bills were the team Kansas City traded up with in order to get Mahomes. So, they could have had him or Watson for a year already. Or you know, kept that other guy who took them to the playoffs for the first time in 20 years. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 2
supremebve Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 3 minutes ago, Dolfan in NYC said: Or you know, kept that other guy who took them to the playoffs for the first time in 20 years. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Dude, when they were in the playoff hunt and benched Tyrod for Peterman, I knew Tyrod was gone. The real issue is that they decided that Peterman was the starter after training camp. This may get worse before it gets better, because I don't believe in Josh Allen at all.
Kuetsar Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 They shouldn't have traded Mccaron. He could have donated his body to the next two weeks, because those D's are brutal. I've seen flashes with Allen, which is more than Peterman has ever shown. I didn't really like the pick of Allen, I thought they should have addressed the lack of depth on the team, but it is what it is. BTW even Tyrod would have gotten eaten alive behind that line. Tyrod is barely above replacement level anyway, but that's still way above where Peterman and Allen right now. They need to get someone, anyone NOW in case of an injury. . .
Dolfan in NYC Posted September 12, 2018 Author Posted September 12, 2018 4 minutes ago, Kuetsar said: They shouldn't have traded Mccaron. He could have donated his body to the next two weeks, because those D's are brutal. I've seen flashes with Allen, which is more than Peterman has ever shown. I didn't really like the pick of Allen, I thought they should have addressed the lack of depth on the team, but it is what it is. BTW even Tyrod would have gotten eaten alive behind that line. Tyrod is barely above replacement level anyway, but that's still way above where Peterman and Allen right now. They need to get someone, anyone NOW in case of an injury. . . God, it's almost as if there's a whole other thread about this exact sort of situation and someone who'd be happy to play. 4
supremebve Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 Just now, Kuetsar said: They shouldn't have traded Mccaron. He could have donated his body to the next two weeks, because those D's are brutal. I've seen flashes with Allen, which is more than Peterman has ever shown. I didn't really like the pick of Allen, I thought they should have addressed the lack of depth on the team, but it is what it is. BTW even Tyrod would have gotten eaten alive behind that line. Tyrod is barely above replacement level anyway, but that's still way above where Peterman and Allen right now. They need to get someone, anyone NOW in case of an injury. . . Tyrod isn't great, but in a league with about 10 good quarterbacks he's better than replacement level. How many legitimately good quarterbacks are in the league? Nick Foles was the Super Bowl MVP last season, and Matt Ryan was the league MVP the year before, I don't think I describe either of those dudes as good.
Mike Campbell Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 Rodgers is questionable for Sunday against the Vikings. I'm wondering if they'll keep him out, in order to try to salvage their season, and prevent the Minnesota defense from finishing what Chicago started. After what Chicago did to Kizer on Sunday, Brett Hundley probably sounds good to Green Bay right about now.
Craig H Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 You know, I hear there's this guy named Colin Kaepernick that's not a bad QB and better than both Kizer and Hundley and this guy is available. He even has a deal with Nike! Maybe give him a look? 1 4
Dolfan in NYC Posted September 12, 2018 Author Posted September 12, 2018 24 minutes ago, Mike Campbell said: Rodgers is questionable for Sunday against the Vikings. I'm wondering if they'll keep him out, in order to try to salvage their season, and prevent the Minnesota defense from finishing what Chicago started. After what Chicago did to Kizer on Sunday, Brett Hundley probably sounds good to Green Bay right about now. So does missing the playoffs by one game?
dogwelder Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 6 hours ago, supremebve said: Tyrod isn't great, but in a league with about 10 good quarterbacks he's better than replacement level. How many legitimately good quarterbacks are in the league? Nick Foles was the Super Bowl MVP last season, and Matt Ryan was the league MVP the year before, I don't think I describe either of those dudes as good. I think most can agree that there are four legit great QBs right now: Brady, Rodgers, Brees, and Big Ben. I'll throw in Rivers, Alex Smith, Cam and Russell as legit good. 1
Brian Fowler Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 41, 34 and injury prone, 39, 36, injury prone, openly talked about retiring and I'm not sure he's actually still great. Yikes
dogwelder Posted September 12, 2018 Posted September 12, 2018 It is a little surprising how there seems to be a lot of middle tier QBs given the greater emphasis on passing in the current NFL. Is it a little too easy for QBs now because of the relaxed rules for offenses?
Beech27 Posted September 13, 2018 Posted September 13, 2018 I think there are very few unconditionally good/great quarterbacks, but probably quite a few who have been or could be very good depending on circumstance. Like, Ryan’s MVP season happened. Granted, PFF suggested he had really incredible luck when it came to contested and interceptable balls, but if he had stayed close to that, he’d be very good (at least). But he lost his OC, Sarkisian hasn’t impressed, and here we are. Alex Smith was an all-time bust, until he had a run of creatively conservative offensive coaches who could make his checking down work—and last year he had one of the best passer ratings on deep balls in the NFL, because Hill and Kelce were so often schemed open. Mahomes is clearly more skilled, but gets all those same benefits now—how would he look in Buffalo? Obviously everyone wants Rogers or Brady, but the problems really start when you build your team like you have those guys—even when you don’t. It is, after all, a salary cap league. Flacco, Wilson, and Ben all won on cheap deals with great defenses. It’s been harder for the first two to replicate that since their cap hit went way up—to say nothing of guys like Carr and Stafford who have similarly inflated salaries and even less success behind it all. But then, what happens if you don’t pay those guys? It’s harder to start over, and a lot of people get fired, so good(ish) quarterbacks perpetuate the very circumstances that prevent them from looking better.
username Posted September 13, 2018 Posted September 13, 2018 5 hours ago, dogwelder said: I think most can agree that there are four legit great QBs right now: Brady, Rodgers, Brees, and Big Ben. I'll throw in Rivers, Alex Smith, Cam and Russell as legit good. Did you see him play last week? Forget great, I'm worried that even good is rapidly walking out the door. 1
Brian Fowler Posted September 13, 2018 Posted September 13, 2018 Stafford is the ultimate statistical guy. Nobody has put up better numbers through age 30 than him, but there's nothing but a handful of first round eliminations to show for it.
Tabe Posted September 13, 2018 Posted September 13, 2018 16 hours ago, Brian Fowler said: Stafford is the ultimate statistical guy. Nobody has put up better numbers through age 30 than him, but there's nothing but a handful of first round eliminations to show for it. Tough to argue with this. He's had shockingly little help but he also hasn't really elevated anything. He's had one great year (2011), one excellent year (2015), and a lot of "meh" that featured a ton of yards. He's had a series of OCs that don't care about running the ball and a series of GMs that don't care about protecting the QB. But...he also is willing to abandon his technique at the drop of a hat and make poor decisions. He's limited INTs in recent years but his accuracy suffers when he "gets fancy". I firmly believe there's a great quarterback in there somewhere but we've only seen flashes.
Tabe Posted September 13, 2018 Posted September 13, 2018 For example - Detroit ran the ball only 13 times this past Sunday in a game that was tied 17-17 in the 3rd quarter.
sabremike Posted September 13, 2018 Posted September 13, 2018 On 9/12/2018 at 11:20 AM, Dolfan in NYC said: Or you know, kept that other guy who took them to the playoffs for the first time in 20 years. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ With the way the line has gone to complete shit he'd end up being killed like any other poor bastard who ends up as the Bills QB. The team is being incredibly stupid to put Allen in because he is just going to get beaten up badly. Why would you put him in that position? 1
Recommended Posts