Lawful Metal Posted January 4, 2017 Share Posted January 4, 2017 15 minutes ago, Ryan said: Is he going to get drunk and hit on Suzy Kolber's possibly nonexistent daughter in a few decades? Yaaaassssss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KidNatural Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 4 hours ago, FluffSnackwell said: Much more likely that Brock is going to be out of the league entirely and wearing panty hose over his head robbing supermarkets with other hack washout QB's such as Jared Lorenzen like some scene straight out of Raising Arizona. He doesn't need the money mind you. It will just be some impulsive act done out of shame and depression. He won't have to do that... He's already robbed enough people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuetsar Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 EJ's going to have to though. . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Mann Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 1/2/2017 at 10:09 AM, hammerva said: I really hope the Steelers don't have the same mentality that they did the first time they played them. If not then we could see a Tebow like upset. Never mind the fact that they kind of made Ajayi into the star that he is now. Considering there's about a 2% chance Tannehill is going to start, they're just going to stack the box and dare Matt Moore to beat them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Serious Darius Bagfelt Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 On 1/2/2017 at 0:37 PM, sabremike said: This makes no sense. What was the NFL supposed to do, be like evil Mr McMahon and change the Pats opponent to a tougher one? I'm no Pats fan but gun to your head do you not think Goodell dreads the thought of handing them the Lombardi in a month? That would be sweet if Goodell has to put on one of those fake, forced smiles on his face like Rozelle did when he handed the trophy to Al Davis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawful Metal Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 The rumors that Bill O'Brien is getting axed if he doesn't have a deep playoff run are rampant in this town. Jesus Christ that's deplorable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Fowler Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 4 hours ago, Josh Mann said: Considering there's about a 2% chance Tannehill is going to start, they're just going to stack the box and dare Matt Moore to beat them. Isn't that exactly how Tebow beat them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted January 5, 2017 Share Posted January 5, 2017 Maybe they'll pick up Tebow out of nowhere and he'll start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dolfan in NYC Posted January 5, 2017 Author Share Posted January 5, 2017 Connor Cook is starting for the Raiders on Saturday. I wish the Texans good luck in the Divisional round against the Pats. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Travis Sheldon Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 4 hours ago, Dolfan in NYC said: Connor Cook is starting for the Raiders on Saturday. I wish the Texans good luck in the Divisional round against the Pats. Overconfident much? Brock Osweiler is starting for the Texans on Saturday. I wish the Texans good luck against the Raiders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyWhioux Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 What I've seen of the Raiders minus Derek Carr vs. the Raiders w/ Derek Carr does not fill me with confidence (and his absence seems to affect the defense as badly as it does the offense). I mean, its a mental thing (for the defense anyway) so maybe knowing it's going to be the case all week long will have better results than suddenly being thrust into the situation mid game via injury but that was the case against Denver last week and they were still woeful. About all Connor Cook is going to do, I'm afraid, is make the trivia question "who was the last starting QB for the Oakland Raiders?" an impossible stumper for people 20 years from now. Here's hoping I'm wrong, but... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elsalvajeloco Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 36 minutes ago, BobbyWhioux said: "who was the last starting QB for the Oakland Raiders?" With the Raiders' current luck, Garrett Gilbert could be the answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Travis Sheldon Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 I don't have any expectations for the Raiders against the Texans. Just hope they show some fire. The last game against the donks was bad, but they were playing against a team looking for revenge and an eye towards sending their coach out with a win. May the spirit of Jay Schroeder guide Cook as he runs for his life. (And hold on to the fucking football fer chrissakes!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Mann Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 The spirit of Jay Schroeder would have footballs landing in Mexico. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dewar Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 Where's Jeff George when you need him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dolfan in NYC Posted January 6, 2017 Author Share Posted January 6, 2017 Out. Like Ryan Tannehill is now confirmed to be. Matt Moore will start against the Steelers. Smoke em if you got em. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuetsar Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 I'd say summon the spirit of Frank Reich, but then they'd be down 35-3 early in the 3rd, but then a Houston team would blow the lead. . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Mann Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 2 hours ago, Dolfan in NYC said: Out. Like Ryan Tannehill is now confirmed to be. Matt Moore will start against the Steelers. Smoke em if you got em. Not worried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Mann Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 This game so far has been as hilarious as advertised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Fowler Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 10-19 for 87 and a pick between them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipGofern Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 All the fantasy guys who took Hopkins in the first round only to see him flame out spectacularly are probably losing their minds watching his performance with Brock today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Travis Sheldon Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 Why can't ESPN afford a QB that was worth a shit? They got a HOF WR & DB on the panel, but can't do any better than Hasselbeck and Dilfer. SMH As for the game, so far it's not the blowout everyone was expecting. Yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 No great QB with any sense of self-worth needs the money or wants to work there? That's how you get BOOMER on CBS. Wait... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Wilson Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 Trying to decide if this is the worst duo of teams to ever play each other in the Playoffs. Not their potential/without injuries, but how they currently are today. Poor Connor, he just isn't ready for this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 His dad says he is, will probably continue believing that after the inevitable loss and future removal of Cook's spleen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts