Gonzalez Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 That's longer than a few seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victator Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 I think the fact somebody felt the need to document it, shows how rare it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bink_winkleman Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 Bald and Goatee is not a unique look, even in 1997. Maybe Austin was ripping off Nikita Koloff. Context. No one but the top guy in the other company was really rocking that look in 1997. And the comparisons barely lasted because the gimmicks couldn't be more different. But yeah, if you were flipping back and forth at the time, it made sense. I remember a buddy telling me they looked alike and I had one of those Keanu meme moments. And I think it's time to exit the thread before I start liking Gonzalez's posts. Hey I know a dude who doesn't get on the internet who thinks that Ryback is a Goldberg ripoff so since everyone is just completely making shit up in this thread, I'll definitively state that all casuals think Ryback is a Goldberg clone. "Casuals." That's like "GDI" for wrestling forums. Also, you forced me to do a quick Google search for a wrestler with a scarecrow/strawman pic that I could post, and I failed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victator Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 Those people were idiots then and they are now. They kept saying it well into 1999. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victator Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 Or maybe Austin was ripping off Perry Saturn, he shaved his head in early 96. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cristobal Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 Most "YES" chants don't go much longer than 20 seconds. And can DVDVR just collectively agree to start ignoring Victator explaining that everyone other than 3 internet nerds agrees with him like most of us ignore Gonzalez arguing merch sales? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzalez Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 Was Goldberg naturally bald, or was he faux bald? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victator Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 I get it, you guys identify with the idiots who chant Goldberg. You think Goldberg invented being bald and doing steroids. Those chants validate your existence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dank Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 jdw did Victator's troll gimmick way better when he rebutted someone saying Flair/Tsuruta had a million false finishes by counting the number of false finishes. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niners Fan in CT Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 If someone wants to debate me on Cena, I'm all for it. This time last year I was writing how I couldn't stand Cena's character anymore and he needs to go away and while that was over-the-top, it's true... I hated his character and did not mind his little vacation. However, I'm not an idiot. I can see how great of a promo he is when he's given a little freedom and the toilet humor is turned off. He's far and away the best promo man they have on the current roster. What he was able to do this past week on RAW was an example of that. In-ring.. I have always enjoyed his matches. He's had incredible runs with pretty much everyone. All types. All shapes and sizes. Even the match a couple weeks back with Sandow was fucking great. That's the starting point of any debate.... Best promo and at the very least top 5 WWE worker. What's the issue with either statement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 Was Goldberg naturally bald, or was he faux bald? faux bald. You can see the shadow of his hairline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cristobal Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 That's the starting point of any debate.... Best promo and at the very least top 5 WWE worker. What's the issue with either statement? I might dispute top 5 in terms of in-ring performance, but I wouldn't dispute top 10, and I think the difference between my #5 and Cena is not a large one, and can fairly be attributed to personal preference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goodear Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 Because no one asked... Goodear's Official WWE (and NXT) Top Ten In Ring Performers Daniel Bryan Antonio Cesaro Luke Harper Sami Zayn Seth Rollins Mark Henry John Cena Goldust Dean Ambrose William Regal That's it. That's the list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niners Fan in CT Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 I'll have to watch more NXT but no way in hell is Seth Rollins and Luke Harper above either Cena or Goldust and I like both guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MORELOCK Posted December 14, 2013 Share Posted December 14, 2013 Also, we all love Regal and for good reason, but he's not even as active as Brock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Petey Posted December 14, 2013 Share Posted December 14, 2013 I've only read page one and page ten of this thread, nothing else. What the hell happened in between the other eight pages that got us to where we are now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raziel Posted December 14, 2013 Share Posted December 14, 2013 I've only read page one and page ten of this thread, nothing else. What the hell happened in between the other eight pages that got us to where we are now? hyperbole, gimmicks, and a newfound love for Warrior and Goldberg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Petey Posted December 14, 2013 Share Posted December 14, 2013 Newfound love? As in, people didn't already love Warrior and Goldberg? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Spanish Waiter Posted December 14, 2013 Share Posted December 14, 2013 Newfound? Warrior had more charisma in his gonads than the entire main event roster of today combined. Cena aside, there isn't anyone else on the roster today you would believably put over Goldberg. Both those guys owned. WWE is a bunch of blowhards and bitches. It's like saying people loved Arnold and Sly ironically, and that the world is a better place with Matt Damon and Ryan Gosling as heroes. Awful. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Fowler Posted December 14, 2013 Share Posted December 14, 2013 Warrior was either a terrible wrestler who had a surprisingly high amount of good matches, or a good wrestler who had a truly inexplicable amount of god-awful matches, and I am honestly not sure which. Goldberg was great at squashes, and he eventually developed into a perfectly serviceable main event guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzalez Posted December 14, 2013 Share Posted December 14, 2013 Newfound? Warrior had more charisma in his gonads than the entire main event roster of today combined. Cena aside, there isn't anyone else on the roster today you would believably put over Goldberg. Both those guys owned. WWE is a bunch of blowhards and bitches. It's like saying people loved Arnold and Sly ironically, and that the world is a better place with Matt Damon and Ryan Gosling as heroes. Maybe not Damon, and Gosling. But the world is better place with Jason Statham as our #1 action hero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Spanish Waiter Posted December 14, 2013 Share Posted December 14, 2013 Your taste in men is worse than your taste in men in spandex. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzalez Posted December 14, 2013 Share Posted December 14, 2013 The Crank, and Transporter films are better than any of the films that Arnold, and Sly put out in the 80's. And he has more natural charisma than any of those two roid monsters ever had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Spanish Waiter Posted December 14, 2013 Share Posted December 14, 2013 Do you shave your armpits? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Fowler Posted December 14, 2013 Share Posted December 14, 2013 The Crank, and Transporter films are better than any of the films that Arnold, and Sly put out in the 80's. And he has more natural charisma than any of those two roid monsters ever had. .... So, clearly, you have never seen First Blood. Or The Terminator. Or Commando. Or Predator. Or any of the Rocky movies. Or Cobra. Or Conan the Barbarian. Hell, Statham isn't even successful. (And I liked Crank, and didn't mind The Transporter. But come the fuck on.) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now