Jump to content
DVDVR Message Board

Recommended Posts

Posted

I hope American sports fan aren’t as paranoid and suspicious towards officials as European futbol fans are. But then American officials have been implemented in gambling scandals. Not sure about futbol referees off the top of my head, like I am with Tim Donaghey (sp). 

  • Like 1
Posted

This is probably just coincidence, but teams are now 0-5 the week after playing the Lions (Dallas had a bye.)

Posted

Two different referees watched that facemask from no more than 10 feet away and didn't call it. It boggles the mind. I would love to sit down next to both of them, watch the replay, and get them to explain why they didn't call it. Since they both SAW IT. 

  • Like 3
Posted

One game I think ref's should wear body cams to show how different the game looks to them.

  • Like 1
Posted

Via an email to season ticket holders- Miami will be hosting an international game next season 

Posted

Hopkins will probably be good and occasionally great in an Andy Reid offense. Any WR who wants to play is good in that offense, even the ones that aren’t actually good. If that Toney dude just knew how to catch he would have been great because he was sure always open.

Posted
9 hours ago, Brian Fowler said:

This is probably just coincidence, but teams are now 0-5 the week after playing the Lions (Dallas had a bye.)

this ended up being my favorite stat about the '22 Niners.  So, not necessarily.

Posted

My pet complaint for a while is part of the NFL's officiating problem is that the minutae of the rulebook has now moved beyond the capacity of the human eye to adjudicate in real time.

I think players continuing to be bigger stronger and faster than ever before plays into that as well.

(And to add my other pet complaint to the mix, the modern uniforms and the overproliferation of new looks and alternate looks effectively creates "camouflage" in certain matchups.  No player should ever be allowed to wear gloves the same shade of yellow as penalty flags, for instance, but several teams do).

Plus, refs tend to be older dudes and they're insanely still not full time league employees, but moonlighters doing their second jobs.

None of this really answers "how the fuck do two of you look at a flagrant face mask and not see/call it?" of course (or the real question, "why doesn't the league give these guys more help seeing this stuff?").  But I can sorta understand why they might miss some subtler/quicker face masks, at least, especially since they're also expected to watch a billion other things, including but not limited to apparently Goodell will shoot your dog if you don't hit your Ineligible Man Downfield quota.

Or [TINFOIL HAT MODE ENGAGED] how the replay challenge system has always had exemptions (no penalties, no judgement calls, nothing in the last two minutes) that prevent you from challenging what/when you need to most.
 

Posted

Incidentally, the referees responded to questions by saying they were blocked and couldn't see the facemask. Never mind that there are screen caps showing them looking right at it with no blocking of their line of sight. 

  • Thanks 2
Posted

Tua has cleared the Protocol and will start on Sunday for the Dolphins vs. Arizona.

  • Like 1
Posted

The refs were so focused on seeing the play, they missed seeing the play.

Not like the Skol Bandits were going to make a comeback, but it does give the fans the thought they were screwed.

Typical NFL booking.

Posted
3 hours ago, BloodyChamp said:

If that Toney dude just knew how to catch he would have been great because he was sure always open.

You got the causation and correlation a little backwards there.

Posted
1 hour ago, Travis Sheldon said:

The refs were so focused on seeing the play, they missed seeing the play.

Not like the Skol Bandits were going to make a comeback, but it does give the fans the thought they were screwed.

Typical NFL booking.

I don't think anybody believes they were going to come back. And, really, Darnold is partly at fault for sitting back there in the end zone for half an hour. But... 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Tabe said:

I don't think anybody believes they were going to come back. And, really, Darnold is partly at fault for sitting back there in the end zone for half an hour. But... 

I wish someone would have brought up the obvious like Al does most weeks on commentary about gambling. 28-20 would’ve been a point and a half under, but conveniently giving the Rams two more to make it 30-20 meant the over hit by a half point. I don’t want to be that guy but what are the odds at least one of the refs had some money on the game or coming their way if the over hit? Especially based on the screen caps showing they saw the face mask.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Just Adam Bay Bay said:

I wish someone would have brought up the obvious like Al does most weeks on commentary about gambling. 28-20 would’ve been a point and a half under, but conveniently giving the Rams two more to make it 30-20 meant the over hit by a half point. I don’t want to be that guy but what are the odds at least one of the refs had some money on the game or coming their way if the over hit? Especially based on the screen caps showing they saw the face mask.

I would say the odds are somewhere north of zero. 

Personally, I think called and uncalled personal fouls should be reviewable. 

I saw a clip of Rich Eisen the other day where he was saying that his #1 rule change would be to allow reviews of personal fouls. That old saying, "they always get the second guy"? That should be retired thanks to video reviews. And bogus safeties. 

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Tabe said:

I don't think anybody believes they were going to come back. And, really, Darnold is partly at fault for sitting back there in the end zone for half an hour. But... 

"it's not like they were gonna win anyway"/"it didn't effect the outcome of the game" being treated as an acceptable excuse is how we got into this mess in the first place.

  • Like 4
Posted
6 hours ago, Tabe said:

Incidentally, the referees responded to questions by saying they were blocked and couldn't see the facemask. Never mind that there are screen caps showing them looking right at it with no blocking of their line of sight. 

"My Monitor Went Out, What Happened?"

  • Haha 1
Posted

Remember, the refs already made it clear they won't accept having certain judgement calls made reviewable. Have we already forgotten the one year experiment with pass interference?

Posted

I barely heard it on TV but wasn't this officiating crew part of another bad missed call? Thought I heard that right but I took a call after that part and missed context. 

If there is truth to that then sounds like banning the crew from NFL officiating would help a lot even though it's not gonna be anywhere close to happening. But it sure would be nice. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

It is still early but imagine if the Patriots beat the Jets 

By the way, not a fan of the all white uniforms.   The helmets are fine but can't get into the rest

Posted

Lions dropped 35 on the Titans in the first half

Do they hate them for random reasons like they hate the Cowboys?

Posted
1 minute ago, RIPPA said:

Lions dropped 35 on the Titans in the first half

Do they hate them for random reasons like they hate the Cowboys?

Scab team that should still be the Houston Oilers?  Good enough for me.

  • Like 2
Posted

The Lions had *9* yards passing in the first half. And scored 35 points. 

And they continue to have more offensive touchdowns (5) than incompletions (2).

Posted

And that's not an ideal start to the second half for the Titans. Goff still has 28 passing yards, the team still has 9 net yards passing after sacks. They're up 42-14.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...