Dolfan in NYC Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 Apparently the stroke Malcolm Young had has caused him to be unable to play and they're cancelling the upcoming tour and calling it quits. Official word coming tomorrow (Australia time). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 Ugh. Sucks that they're packing it in, but it says a metric ton for Malcolm that they wouldn't even consider going on without him. Maybe Angus can finally graduate from primary school now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Natural Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 Strokes are nasty fuckers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstout Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 They've toured without Malcolm before (with Malcolm's nephew), but I guess he's such a part of the songwriting process that they can't make an album without him. They should be doing OK for money, one would bet. It's cool that they're acknowledging they're not 100 percent without him and not endlessly slogging on doing greatest-hits tours and no new material. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuerrillaMonsoon Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 I believe they made a pact with the other band members post Bon to not replace each other. I remember going to see them in 2008. Broke my leg playing cricket that day. Wasn't interested in giving up a ticket I paid hundreds for. Hobbled along on crutches. Absolutely hated it. Dickheads everywhere. Still remember the guitar solos though. Made it more than worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casey Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 Billboard says the rumors are false. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 BAH GAWD, KING! THAT'S. . .um, AC/DC's music. http://loudwire.com/conflicting-reports-acdc-future/ According to The Australian, the group has booked a six-week stint set to begin May 1 in Vancouver to lay down music for their next album, which would be their first since 2008′s ‘Black Ice.’ Johnson had stated earlier this year that he was confident that a new album would get done and that it would coincide with a tour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Lord Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 There's some really weird rumors floating about Malcom right now. Everything from early onset Alzhiemers/Demntia to advanced cancer. I mean just the other day Aerosmith played a show without Brad Whitford because he was on that Hendrix tour. It's one thing to have someone fill in, but it really does say a lot about AC/DC if Malcom is so bad off that they are willing to call it quits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstout Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Aerosmith has played several shows without Whitford and Tom Hamilton (though dunno about at the same time) due to health issues. Generally, someone from Joe Perry's solo band fills in. My whole notion of "irreplaceable" in a rock/pop band bit the dust when Bon Jovi started touring wiithout Richie Sambora. I figured the fans wouldn't stand for it, but they don't care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuerrillaMonsoon Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I saw Richie Sambora completely trashed on stage a few months ago. I can see why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstout Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I figured that had more to do with it than money, like Jon Bon Jovi said. He probably said "get thyself to rehab or no more tour," and Sambora said "problem? What problem? I'm fine....." and that was that. Could Steven Tyler tour in a band called Aerosmith without Joe Perry? Could Mick tour in the Stones without Keith? I say "maybe" to scenario 1, "probably not" to scenario 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Fowler Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Didn't Joe Perry threaten to do an Aerosmith tour without Steven Tyler a few years ago? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Lord Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Didn't Joe Perry threaten to do an Aerosmith tour without Steven Tyler a few years ago? Yeah. And supposedly they had Joe Lynn Turner lined up for a tour and possibly album because Stephen Tyler wanted to do solo stuff. When I mentioned Brad Whitford, Aerosmith played as a 4 piece at a special show at the Whiskey (its on youtube from live nation). Granted the keyboard player was with them and Slash joined in at the end, but still they were a 4 piece. Well as for ACDC, they put out a statement today saying that Malcom is taking time off for his health but they are not retiring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cool arrow Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Have we forgotten the Joe Perry Project already? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Mann Posted April 17, 2014 Share Posted April 17, 2014 Could Steven Tyler tour in a band called Aerosmith without Joe Perry? He did exactly that in the late 70s/early 80s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hooks Posted April 18, 2014 Share Posted April 18, 2014 Could Steven Tyler tour in a band called Aerosmith without Joe Perry? He did exactly that in the late 70s/early 80s. While that's true, fans didn't exactly love the idea and they weren't the powerhouse they once were. And that was back before the massive comeback. It's been almost 30 years since that comeback, and in that time it has been pretty much established that Steven Tyler and Joe Perry are the two guys that most fans see as the pillars of the band. I mean, I'm a huge fan, and I love all 5 of them. I've seen them 13 times,once without Tom Hamilton when he was out while undergoing treatment for throat cancer. It was odd, but I could accept it because hey it was a no fault situation. But if they ever just replaced a member due to a simple squabble again, I probably wouldn't see them live again, because for me as a fan, those 5 are Aerosmith. During the whole "replace Steven Tyler" thing a few years ago, I never really took it serious. I saw it as a bunch of dudes all publicly sniping at each other, but I can't imagine turnout would have been good for Aerosmith with a different lead singer. But as a lot of tours prove, anything is possible. People will go see almost anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now