MarcosLoura Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Can we stop talking about the shitty Superman movie? Fucking hell. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.T. Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Comic fans couldn't handle Superman breaking Zod's neck. Could the world's inhaler manufacturers cover a crisis caused by people being shot in a Guardians movie? Apples, oranges. Comic book fans couldn't handle Superman breaking Zod's neck because Superman isn't supposed to kill people, not because they can't handle violence. Rocket has a machine gun. I look forward to the blatant shedding of Kree blood. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Natural Posted February 20, 2014 Author Share Posted February 20, 2014 I'll try to get Thor: The Dark World on its DVD release next week so I've watched every Marvel Studios film. I'd like to watch Captain America: The First Avenger again before Captain America: The Winter Soldier comes out next month. All this is situation depending. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Spanish Waiter Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Comic fans couldn't handle Superman breaking Zod's neck. Could the world's inhaler manufacturers cover a crisis caused by people being shot in a Guardians movie? Apples, oranges. Comic book fans couldn't handle Superman breaking Zod's neck because Superman isn't supposed to kill people, not because they can't handle violence. Rocket has a machine gun. I look forward to the blatant shedding of Kree blood. But Superman did it before, so its s flawed standard to hold the movie to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.T. Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Comic fans couldn't handle Superman breaking Zod's neck. Could the world's inhaler manufacturers cover a crisis caused by people being shot in a Guardians movie? Apples, oranges. Comic book fans couldn't handle Superman breaking Zod's neck because Superman isn't supposed to kill people, not because they can't handle violence. Rocket has a machine gun. I look forward to the blatant shedding of Kree blood. But Superman did it before, so its s flawed standard to hold the movie to. You are preaching to the choir, man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Fresh Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Comic fans couldn't handle Superman breaking Zod's neck. Could the world's inhaler manufacturers cover a crisis caused by people being shot in a Guardians movie? Apples, oranges. Comic book fans couldn't handle Superman breaking Zod's neck because Superman isn't supposed to kill people, not because they can't handle violence. Rocket has a machine gun. I look forward to the blatant shedding of Kree blood. . Well, not Kree, because the Kree are part of Fox's Fantastic Four license, but I get your point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.T. Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Chitauri, Badoon, whatever the BBE Alien Races are in the Disney Marvelverse. I expect a high body count. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt D Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Comic fans couldn't handle Superman breaking Zod's neck. Could the world's inhaler manufacturers cover a crisis caused by people being shot in a Guardians movie? Apples, oranges. Comic book fans couldn't handle Superman breaking Zod's neck because Superman isn't supposed to kill people, not because they can't handle violence. Rocket has a machine gun. I look forward to the blatant shedding of Kree blood. But Superman did it before, so its s flawed standard to hold the movie to. And people bitched when Byrne had him do it too. They're consistent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Spanish Waiter Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 They're bitches IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bustronaut Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 It's such a rare occasion when it happens it needs to MEAN something. Rocket killing someone doesn't mean anything, because he does it all the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Spanish Waiter Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 So essentially Rocket Raccoon mowing down gomers is less offensive than Superman killing a single dude who plans on terraforming earth and turning humans into slaves? Got it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.T. Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 So essentially Rocket Raccoon mowing down gomers is less offensive than Superman killing a single dude who plans on terraforming earth and turning humans into slaves? Got it Zod didn't want slaves, man. He wanted fertilizer for the soil of New Krypton. Again, preaching to the choir, bro. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Comic fans couldn't handle Superman breaking Zod's neck. Could the world's inhaler manufacturers cover a crisis caused by people being shot in a Guardians movie? Apples, oranges. Comic book fans couldn't handle Superman breaking Zod's neck because Superman isn't supposed to kill people, not because they can't handle violence. Rocket has a machine gun. I look forward to the blatant shedding of Kree blood. But Superman did it before, so its s flawed standard to hold the movie to. It's usually kind of a character defining moment, in fact. Killing Zod is what tempers him from doing it ever again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Spanish Waiter Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Which could very well play out in the next movie. Right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bustronaut Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 If it ever gets made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig H Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 What gets made first, SvB or Akira? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elsalvajeloco Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 SvB because a three year gap between movies isn't unprecedented. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tromatagon Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Ex. every Star Wars film that mattered Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Natural Posted February 20, 2014 Author Share Posted February 20, 2014 With the first teaser trailer for Guardians of the Galaxy now out and about, director James Gunn recently participated in a great, fast-paced Q&A with Kevin Pereira of Pointless podcast. While the full interview is being saved for next week, Pereira has shared five minutes of their chat, which reveals some intriguing nuggets. One of those nuggets is that while Marvel Studios has partial rights to the Skrulls, they do not own the Badoon, which is why we'll see the Sakaaran in the movie. Listen to the interview above and be warned it contains strong language. What do you think? Credit: comicbookmovie.com 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ligerbusa Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Are you guys saying Superman vs Batman is in development hell? That's outrageous, it was delayed once but it most certainly is happening. Also, I think you are taking it too seriously. There's nothing more serious than comic book movies and I'd like to fight you for suggesting otherwise. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Z Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 With the first teaser trailer for Guardians of the Galaxy now out and about, director James Gunn recently participated in a great, fast-paced Q&A with Kevin Pereira of Pointless podcast. While the full interview is being saved for next week, Pereira has shared five minutes of their chat, which reveals some intriguing nuggets. One of those nuggets is that while Marvel Studios has partial rights to the Skrulls, they do not own the Badoon, which is why we'll see the Sakaaran in the movie. Listen to the interview above and be warned it contains strong language. What do you think? Credit: comicbookmovie.com So, no Kree/Skrull war on cinema? The biggest scoop for me was "Some things you have to wait and see" to being asked about Adam Warlock and Captain Marvel. That's basically a yes, right? I'm calling it now, Adam Warlock in the after credits teaser for GotG 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Natural Posted February 20, 2014 Author Share Posted February 20, 2014 (edited) We get to hear Bradley Cooper as Rocket Raccoon! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nyddEhXSvA&list=UUVJWMJivK-w1AfIZxLAlEfg&feature=c4-overview http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9z04zXq7jk&feature=c4-overview&list=UUVJWMJivK-w1AfIZxLAlEfg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Rf2a8zBrM4&list=UUVJWMJivK-w1AfIZxLAlEfg&feature=c4-overview http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q104YhObyV0 Edited February 20, 2014 by The Natural Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Spanish Waiter Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Hahaha Marvel balls deep with shitty no mark characters like Adam Warlock will be hilarious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Z Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Hahaha Marvel balls deep with shitty no mark characters like Adam Warlock will be hilarious. Adam Warlock was one of the original GotG members of the Abnett/Lanning run that this movie is mostly based on, so him not being on the team was kind of a surprise anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts