Ultimo Necro Posted July 21, 2020 Posted July 21, 2020 Do we think that the “eye for an eye” thing happened because Vince finally heard about/saw Vader v Hanen? If so; that places Vince’s current pop culture timeline around, what 1990? Which also explains the get-up he designed for The Revival.
AxB Posted July 22, 2020 Posted July 22, 2020 59 minutes ago, Ultimo Necro said: Do we think that the “eye for an eye” thing happened because Vince finally heard about/saw Vader v Hanen? If so; that places Vince’s current pop culture timeline around, what 1990? Which also explains the get-up he designed for The Revival. This is Vader, inducting Stan Hansen into the WWE Hall of Fame: So I'd say it's likely Vince knew about that well before. Most likely it's Brucie Pritchard copying AEW's Moxley vs Inner Circle feud.
odessasteps Posted July 22, 2020 Posted July 22, 2020 1 hour ago, Ultimo Necro said: Do we think that the “eye for an eye” thing happened because Vince finally heard about/saw Vader v Hanen? more likely he heard Ron Fullers story about the original Dutch Mantell popping a guys eye out ina shoot.
Phil4126 Posted July 22, 2020 Posted July 22, 2020 So according to WOL, there was a version filmed with a prosthetic eye that was actually shown. If what we saw is the version Vince signed off on and said "This. This is good shit. Put this on my television." HOW BAD WAS THE ORIGINAL SHOT? Jesus this whole feud is so stupid 2
LoneWolf&Subs Posted July 22, 2020 Posted July 22, 2020 13 hours ago, Ultimo Necro said: Do we think that the “eye for an eye” thing happened because Vince finally heard about/saw Vader v Hanen? No, he watched the Sally Field and Kiefer Sutherland movie recently.
nate Posted July 22, 2020 Posted July 22, 2020 "Who's that poppin out his eye? R-e-y Mysterio ..." That's all I got. 1 3
Dolfan in NYC Posted July 22, 2020 Author Posted July 22, 2020 2 minutes ago, nate said: "Who's that poppin out his eye? R-e-y Mysterio ..." That's all I got. USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST. 7
Recommended Posts