Overly Critical Man Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 I remember HHH's 2000 was torn apart pretty savagely on the old board. Didnt it also lead to the 50 Dustin Rhodes matches better than HHH's best match subforum...or was that Lance Storm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Spanish Waiter Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 I remember HHH's 2000 was torn apart pretty savagely on the old board. Didnt it also lead to the 50 Dustin Rhodes matches better than HHH's best match subforum...or was that Lance Storm? They tried, but were outed for making up horrendous lies and overrating anyone they possibly could to slam Hunter. It ended in tears with dylanwaco's black soul separated across 7 horcruxes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goodhelmet Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 As already proven, Triple H in 2000 is pretty untouchable.This was never proven.Conclusively. We can do this again. Nobody actually defended HHH. Not even you. You did what everyone who doesn't have an argument does... insult the poster, not the argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niners Fan in CT Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 People (or I guess I should say Dylan) were rating 3 minute matches where literally nothing happened over Triple H vs. Foley at Royal Rumble. At what point does it become "okay so obviously what you like is WAAAY different than what I like so maybe it's best to move on..." ? I actually like reading Dylan's reviews but when it comes to HHH... I just shake my head because I have never seen him give the guy credit for anything, ever.. I would not be surprised to see him say Khali is a better worker than HHH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Spanish Waiter Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 As already proven, Triple H in 2000 is pretty untouchable.This was never proven.Conclusively. We can do this again. Nobody actually defended HHH. Not even you. You did what everyone who doesn't have an argument does... insult the poster, not the argument. I asked dylan how CM Punk's 2008, a year in which he had maybe three good matches and spent most of the year hurt, was better than Hunter's 2000. He ignored that question so what was the point in even continuing? It was like one of those lists of "movies better than ______" where people pile on and pile on and all of a sudden mutants are seriously arguing that Captain America was a better movie than Pulp Fiction because a couple of shots were nicer and Cap is a more believable character than Vincent Vega. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt D Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 I hate that Jericho vs Punk KOTR match from 2008. I can't imagine Hunter has a worse match than that in 2000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goodhelmet Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 I actually think this discussion is fine but lets give it its own thread. I will respond at length to the thread I create. Back to how HHH will ruin Daniel Bryan and crush his dreams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Spanish Waiter Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 I actually think this discussion is fine but lets give it its own thread. I don't agree. People can't discuss Hunter objectively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie M. Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 I actually think this discussion is fine but lets give it its own thread. I don't agree. People can't discuss Hunter objectively. I was more interested in seeing how Orton's best work stacks up against Triple H's best. These things do always turn into dissections of wrestlers that are super negative so I should have known better than to ask a question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Spanish Waiter Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 I actually think this discussion is fine but lets give it its own thread. I don't agree. People can't discuss Hunter objectively. I was more interested in seeing how Orton's best work stacks up against Triple H's best. These things do always turn into dissections of wrestlers that are super negative so I should have known better than to ask a question. They are actually two similar guys in that their peaks are great. Difference is Hunter had (IMO) two clear peaks, and Orton only really had one, and a higher quality run beneath that level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goodhelmet Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 I actually think this discussion is fine but lets give it its own thread. I don't agree. People can't discuss Hunter objectively. I don't give a shit what anyone else thinks about HHH except you. I want to see you actually examine his work and make a case FOR him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Spanish Waiter Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 I actually think this discussion is fine but lets give it its own thread. I don't agree. People can't discuss Hunter objectively. I don't give a shit what anyone else thinks about HHH except you. I want to see you actually examine his work and make a case FOR him. Well shit, I'll do it bit by bit. This actually works because I haven't seen much since I started rewatching 2000 WWF and got fixated on Steve Blackman instead of everything else. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DylanWaco Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 I remember HHH's 2000 was torn apart pretty savagely on the old board. Didnt it also lead to the 50 Dustin Rhodes matches better than HHH's best match subforum...or was that Lance Storm? They tried, but were outed for making up horrendous lies and overrating anyone they possibly could to slam Hunter. It ended in tears with dylanwaco's black soul separated across 7 horcruxes. I thought it ended when you pretended to be a life long Mark Henry fan to get your heat back? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DylanWaco Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 People (or I guess I should say Dylan) were rating 3 minute matches where literally nothing happened over Triple H vs. Foley at Royal Rumble. At what point does it become "okay so obviously what you like is WAAAY different than what I like so maybe it's best to move on..." ? I actually like reading Dylan's reviews but when it comes to HHH... I just shake my head because I have never seen him give the guy credit for anything, ever.. I would not be surprised to see him say Khali is a better worker than HHH. I wish people wouldn't lie. I actually praised HHH v. Foley in that thread and rated no three minute match where literally nothing happened, but I do understand your life long love affair with HHH makes you incapable of honesty in this case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Spanish Waiter Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 I remember HHH's 2000 was torn apart pretty savagely on the old board. Didnt it also lead to the 50 Dustin Rhodes matches better than HHH's best match subforum...or was that Lance Storm? They tried, but were outed for making up horrendous lies and overrating anyone they possibly could to slam Hunter. It ended in tears with dylanwaco's black soul separated across 7 horcruxes. I thought it ended when you pretended to be a life long Mark Henry fan to get your heat back? I didn't think you would stoop this low. You've brought shame on DVDVR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DylanWaco Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 I'm just trying to pop the marks kiddo. Like putty in my hands 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerva Posted September 9, 2013 Share Posted September 9, 2013 I remember HHH's 2000 was torn apart pretty savagely on the old board. Didnt it also lead to the 50 Dustin Rhodes matches better than HHH's best match subforum...or was that Lance Storm? If we ever see a "50 Lance Storm matches better than" anything on this board, I am going to assume that they sold the site either the Tea Party or that religion that Tom Cruise believes in 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Fowler Posted September 9, 2013 Share Posted September 9, 2013 50 Lance Storm matches better than syphilis. Nope, at least you get to have sex to get the syphilis, still better than Lance Storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now