Ryan Posted February 2, 2014 Posted February 2, 2014 Curious about what the general feeling here is. Most are choosing/rooting for the Broncos. I say the Seahawks for both.
muhammedboehm Posted February 2, 2014 Posted February 2, 2014 Can we add Eli kidnapping Peyton during Halftime so he can throw a pick six at the end then rip off his helmet holding up his two rings screaming about how Peyton 'An't getting number two cause Eli is the best Manning"
twiztor Posted February 2, 2014 Posted February 2, 2014 Broncos 31-17. unless that Eli bit happens, then it becomes the greatest Super Bowl ever and fuck who wins.
Kuetsar Posted February 2, 2014 Posted February 2, 2014 I posted in the SB thread as well, and hell let's be double wrong, Seahawks 52-13, in one of those old school NFC beatdowns, and Manning goes down with an injury at some point early as well. 1
Ryan Posted February 2, 2014 Author Posted February 2, 2014 Game ends in a 0-0 tie due to lightning, Lombardi trophy given to the Bills as back-pay for the early 90's. Ralph Wilson lives to 130 as revenge.
johnnyboy Posted February 2, 2014 Posted February 2, 2014 I got the Seahawks 48-14 in my Madden playing of the game. Broncos ahead 7-3 end of the first quarter, but they never see the lead again. As we all know, Madden sims are never wrong unless someone glitches through the field of play.
FluffSnackwell Posted February 2, 2014 Posted February 2, 2014 I've always detested Brady so that's made me a de facto boltneck guy. Broncos; 23-16. Besides I'm tired of the whole "tarnished legacy/playoff pedestrian" talking point. It will be much more interesting to see Peyton come back next season and shoot for back-to-back titles and tie Brady for three apiece than the Seahawks winning and/or Peyton done did gone and fucked himself in the big game once again.
Hoffman Posted February 2, 2014 Posted February 2, 2014 I'm rooting for the Broncos for no other reason than they have Paris Lenon, the last active XFL player. 1
Death From Above Posted February 2, 2014 Posted February 2, 2014 I pick Denver to win. I have no particular rooting interest. I watch football because I like football.
BrianS81177 Posted February 2, 2014 Posted February 2, 2014 As a lifelong Hawks fan, I pick them to win 24-17. Lynch rushes for 130+ and at least 1 TD.
Brian Fowler Posted February 2, 2014 Posted February 2, 2014 Rooting for the Hawks, and expect them to win in a slightly funny 20-14 score.
LooseCannon Posted February 2, 2014 Posted February 2, 2014 I am rooting for Seattle based on rumors that Floyd Mayweather bet $10m on Denver.
Death From Above Posted February 2, 2014 Posted February 2, 2014 Floyd put out a pic of him with the stacks of cash. I pointed out that when he's inevitably broke in a decade and no one can figure out how that's possible, remember moments like this.
Ryan Posted February 2, 2014 Author Posted February 2, 2014 He probably also bet 20 million on the Seahawks for no reason thinking that somehow covers his losses.
Charlie M. Posted February 2, 2014 Posted February 2, 2014 Seahawks for both. It'd be a good strike against the notion that you can't play defense in "the new NFL." 1
Death From Above Posted February 2, 2014 Posted February 2, 2014 Something tells me if Dallas, Green Bay, and the Giants all had top defenses nobody would spout that silliness.
Ryan Posted February 2, 2014 Author Posted February 2, 2014 If Green Bay had a top defense they'd probably be in this damn game. 2
Charlie M. Posted February 2, 2014 Posted February 2, 2014 To me it's a salary cap thing more than a rules thing. Seattle has the luxury of having a cheap QB who is good enough. When you've got a high priced QB, you cater to him and surround him with other high priced talent. It makes sense but those resources have to come from somewhere else. It'll be interesting to see what happens to Seattle and San Francisco's defenses once their QB's get paid the big money.
Ryan Posted February 2, 2014 Author Posted February 2, 2014 Kaepernick can bolt after next year, so I could see that being contentious. That or they'll franchise him which he's not worth. Wilson's got two more seasons before they have to care.
muhammedboehm Posted February 2, 2014 Posted February 2, 2014 To me it's a salary cap thing more than a rules thing. Seattle has the luxury of having a cheap QB who is good enough. When you've got a high priced QB, you cater to him and surround him with other high priced talent. It makes sense but those resources have to come from somewhere else. It'll be interesting to see what happens to Seattle and San Francisco's defenses once their QB's get paid the big money. Its not just the cheap QB Seattle has a ton of cheap Defensive players also. I think I remember hearing that Wilson is making 3x less then there long snapper.
piranesi Posted February 2, 2014 Posted February 2, 2014 Winner: Daniel Bryan when a massive "Yes" chant breaks out at some point by 80,000 people most of whom have no idea what it is or why they are doing it but can't stop. Come on. There's at least, like, a 35% chance of that happening.
johnnyboy Posted February 3, 2014 Posted February 3, 2014 I got the Seahawks 48-14 in my Madden playing of the game. Remind me to buy a lottery ticket this week. I might not get all 6, but 5 and the bonus ball will do. 1
Kuetsar Posted February 3, 2014 Posted February 3, 2014 I posted in the SB thread as well, and hell let's be double wrong, Seahawks 52-13, in one of those old school NFC beatdowns, and Manning goes down with an injury at some point early as well. I almost had the margin of victory, and but had the style of game right at least. . .
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now