SirFozzie Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 5:00 to play and no hurry from the Bills, kinda surprising. They did get 3, but do they go onside? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincey Greene Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 LOL Of course the headset goes down. Of course it does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirFozzie Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Heeeere we go again.. Has anyone you know, tested the Bills equipment? They seem to fail everywhere (london, Buffalo, New England) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincey Greene Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Obvious catch, except the NFL has Down's Syndrome. So let's see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirFozzie Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Where is the sense of urgency from the Bills? And why is Taylor still in the game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuetsar Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Because EJ is a piece of shit, that's why. . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirFozzie Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 The Pats got a gift win here, the Bills should have been a LOT more urgent starting with 5:00 to play down 10. They were running the clock down to 4:21 with :01 on the play clock. We found out how much losing Edelman (and then Dobson and Amadola) costs the Pats offense. (A lot) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincey Greene Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 Have you seen EJ Manuel play? Buffalo got hosed. Watkins was out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirFozzie Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 I'm wondering if they applied the rule that if you go backwards out of bounds, clock continues to run. Agreed that I think they should have had :02 to play . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister TV Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 So, why didn't the clock stop on the last play? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincey Greene Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 I hope New England runs the table. I like witnessing history. Also other reasons that I dare not voice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death From Above Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 I love the sound guy at Gillette. Just dropped a few seconds of Sabotage. I only saw the end. He played Iron Maiden The Trooper so he's totally not shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirFozzie Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 The reason the clock ran on the final play? Steratore told a pool reporter after the game that the judgment was made that Watkins gave himself up on the play, which is why the clock ran and the play couldn't be reviewed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister TV Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 The reason the clock ran on the final play? Steratore told a pool reporter after the game that the judgment was made that Watkins gave himself up on the play, which is why the clock ran and the play couldn't be reviewed. That's b.s. that crew screwed up way to much they shouldn't work another game this season. Had Watkins made the catch standing up and stepped out of bounds the clock would have stopped, him going to the ground and rolling out is no different. The whole going out of bounds backwards keeping the clock running deal I thought was a forward progress thing, i.e. the defense stops someone at the 50 and drives them back and out of bounds at the 48, so the ball is spotted at the 50 and the clock keeps running. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts