Casey

That doesn't even matter. Plus, that's a rhetorical question because no one knows the answer but Titus. The fact is it happened, and the punishment is way too extreme for such a minor infraction. Especially when, like I said, people like Jack Swagger, Cameron and Wesley Blake from NXT all got DUIs and weren't suspended for any longer than a couple of weeks (if that). This is a total overreaction on Vince's part, but as many people have said, that's par the course for him. It's ridiculous that you can grab the CEO in an OBVIOUS playful and joking manner and get suspended for 3 months or whatever they pushed it down to, but you can endanger someone's life and get barely a slap on the wrist. You can fail a drug test and your first time punishment is less than what Titus got. Fuck, even Emma got barely any punishment when she "stole" something from Wal-Mart and was fired for a DAY.

Please tell me why WWE only suspends a wrestler for 2 or 3 weeks when they engage in a dangerous behavior like drinking and driving, but grabbing your boss infront of the entire roster, an arena full of people and millions around the world warrants a firing (or a suspension that lasts longer than deadly behavior like a DUI). Please, tell me. If you honestly think Titus was about to deck Vince McMahon infront of everyone, you've officially lost it. You can clearly see Vince laughing and smiling, especially the close-up fancam version that's been on the internet for a few days now. This subject has been beaten to death already, but to justify Vince's irrational behavior after the fact because it's "unprofessional" is crazy. Keep him off TV for a week or two, don't let him work house shows. Dock the man's pay. But the punishment he got didn't fit the crime, especially when people like Jack Swagger get off with a few weeks suspension for an action that could have killed someone.

I would wager you'll see very little of Negan until the final few episodes of the season, then everything goes (even further) to hell in a handbasket. People are going to DIE when he finds out what happened to those bikers. How he discovers it was Daryl & Co. is to be determined, but I think Daryl pulling the trigger on the rocket launcher kind of spells out his fate for the end of the season. He's going to have Lucille stuck in his head by the time the season finale rolls around.

No, that's Iron-Spider.

I'm so glad there's a Block User function. You couldn't be more wrong in that entire post. On the flipside, you'll just bitch if he wins in Round 1 or 2 when he's paired against someone you think is amazing, and I fully expect you to come back with a reply stating that you won't do that because... I don't know, you're a superior poster or something? Who knows. Either way, I won't see it. Once again, the other side of the argument mocks and ridicules the other side. Hmm, interesting.

Well, that was just fucking heartbreaking.

Well, at least we know which side of this argument mocks people that don't agree with their opinions.

Too bad I watch it every Wednesday while I'm waiting on Lucha Underground. But, you're free to think what you want. Doesn't mean I have to agree that Corbin isn't being led to great matches. He's improving, but he's still having his hand held by the best in NXT and led around. Just like you don't have to agree with me when I say that Rollins was Top 3 in the WWE last year. You think I'm wrong, I think you're wrong. Let's welcome everyone to the internet.

Same goes for the Lesnar matches too.

Tell that to the guy who initially brought up the talking point of Corbin's heel gimmick being better than Rollins' heel gimmick then. If this is strictly in-ring, then Corbin doesn't belong because being carried to awesome matches with the likes of Joe, Zayn, Balor, etc. is basically cheating when you have someone leading you by the hand the entire way. If this was a March Madness Gimmick Tournament, Corbin should definitely be in the running. Based on his in-ring work? No way. But, hey, it's all good - I'm just someone that "can't accept other people's opinions". Which is a hilarious notion in a thread where the last two pages have been people telling me and maybe 2-3 others that JEFF HARDY or X-PAC are better than Seth Rollins and won't let the talking point of _______ from (insert year) or (insert non-WWE fed) is better and here's why. I really wish RIPPA would just say whether Rollins is in or out so we can stop this. Obviously some people love his work, others don't care for it. It's up to RIPPA, it's his tournament. I think everyone has raised good points for both arguments, even if I don't agree with the anti-Rollins side.

So the senility has begun...

I've got issues with Reigns, New Day, Cena, Corbin, Charlotte, Sheamus, etc. But that's just going off two lists on the last page.

AJ Styles at his last TNA meeting before he debuted at the Royal Rumble:

"I Love Kanye" is the best interlude track he's ever made. This is an incredible album, fuck.

What are you talking about? They were pretty over with the Full Sail crowd.

That's odd, I remember mostly everyone complaining about the constant Reigns vs ______ from League of Nations main events on RAW. I guess everyone secretly loved Sheamus as WWE Champion, too. Give me a break.

International box office: $125mil Domestic box office: $135mil

I love Kanye, he's my favorite artist. But, he does claim to be around $35mil in personal debt.

Look man if there are people that think there were 20 workers in WWE alone that are better than him then maybe he shouldn't be a lock for making the tournament. Just saying. So, what, a few people think Rollins shouldn't be in this and that's a justifiable reason why he shouldn't be? What about the people who actually like Rollins and think he should be in March Madness? I guess that goes out the window because you listed some names that are already locks to be in? I'm sorry, but if Charlotte or Dean Ambrose or Kalisto goes in but Seth Rollins doesn't, the WWE side of things is a joke.

Are we just going to keep bringing up people that aren't in WWE, like lucha guys, Jeff Hardy and Davey Richards? Name one person in WWE that had a stellar year, in-ring, that won't be included in March Madness that should be over someone like Rollins. Name ONE.

ITT people completely missing MORELOCK's point and listing WWE workers that will already be included in the tournament (Bayley, Lesnar, Cesaro, Asuka, etc). I'm looking at you, JCM and GOTNW. Rollins heel character isn't as "great" as Corbin because Rollins heel character is a chickenshit that needed the Authority to help him win everything. His in-ring work, though, was top notch. Switch the characters of Corbin and Rollins and we'd be having the same discussion, but about Baron Corbin. I thought this tournament was about workrate, and in that case, Corbin needs to be at the bottom of the pile. The very bottom. And I like Corbin.

That last part rings true, because I would definitely turn the channel if Jeff Hardy came out on RAW on Monday night. This is one of those apples and oranges kind of things, and I really don't see a comparison here. If this thread is still open in a few days, I'll track down all the Rollins matches I love from the timeframe RIPPA gave us. I will fight and bitch and moan until Rollins is included

I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with that entire post. I don't have a clue why Hardy is even in this conversation, comparative or not, but Rollins is worlds and leagues better than Jeff. And you're going to have to describe this "charisma" that Hardy has, because I've never seen it. I know you aren't talking about mic skills, since there's other ways to be charismatic, but he's always been a big block of wood to me that just falls off ladders and is a ragdoll. Seriously, that's the only appeal for Hardy. He can take a beating and make you feel sorry for him. Is that what you mean? I guess Spike Dudley had that same charisma too. Rollins strikes me as one of those guys that either you really, or you really dislike him, and there's no middle ground.

Chickenshit Heel Champion Rollins was awesome but being around Triple H and Stephanie didn't help him any. Nor did the Kane stuff. I don't know exact airdates and stuff like that, but all I know is that I was never bored by a Seth Rollins match. I'm in that crowd, if it exists, that thinks Rollins before the heel turn, as a face, was kind of boring and bland. Roman and Ambrose were cool as faces because they had these characteristics that could work for either disposition. I've always felt he was a natural heel, and while the chickenshit route probably wasn't the best way to go, he made shit into a salad I thought. I've already forgotten the timeframe eligibility for this, and I can't open multiple tabs without a mouse on my Chromebook, but I even liked the 'Mania 31 match with Orton (but I like Orton too, so...). Cena/Rollins at SummerSlam and Rollins/Sting (before the injury spot) were both fantastic. I'd have to go through his other PPV matches, but I remember liking the vast majority of them. It would be a joke if Ambrose got in but not Rollins. I love Ambrose as a character, but in-ring he is the drizzling shits, and I skip pretty much everything of his.

the Rollins hate is amazing. I'm going to be so pissed if he's not included. The Cena/Rollins SummerSlam match was off the charts awesome, and I'll fight anyone that says otherwise.