This week's Smackdown spoilers.

[Gonzalez]

They really didn't think this through. This should have been Kane's spot, and not the Big Show's. 

[Big Z]

I thought Show's turn last year was predictable and forced, and thus do not want to see that again this year. Now, I think the logical conclusion to both the main angles at Night of Champions (Punk/Heyman and Bryan/Orton) involve interference from yet unknown sources to aid the heels. Cabana saving Heyman would be awesome, and be a great bridge to the eventual Punk/Lesnar rematch where Punk goes over. Bryan probably cannot win at Night of Champions, but obviously cannot lose clean and should not lose just because of HHH. A returning Batista aiding HHH/Orton would be awesome, and again would be a great bridge to when Bryan finally wins the title. I realize that both of those proposed ideas are probably long shots (if not logical), but that is how I would advance those storylines. Bottom line is that these are two of the best storylines at the top of the card in eons.

[LooseCannon]

Could Flair be trusted if they wanted him to show up on Raw to support Daniel Bryan, turn on him at the PPV to cost him the title, then cut a promo on the following Monday in which he name-drops Denny Brown and Ricky Morton while continuing the theme that the WWE braintrust doesn't think Daniel Bryan is qualified to be the face of the company?  Maybe he can also say that he is taking the figure-four back from the unworthy Miz and teaching it to a random Shield guy with instructions that the Shield is supposed to beat down the Miz and put him in the hold if he tries to use the figure-four again.  Bringing in Flair for a couple of weeks probably sounds more doable than Batista returning.

 

If they did that and also had Flair eventually suggest that HHH use a Wargames match to teach Daniel Bryan and friends a lesson, would fans be split over rejoicing about the return of Wargames and being nit-picking continuity nerds who want to point out that Flair is something like 1-16 in his career in WarGames matches so it would be stupid for him to think that is a good idea?

[Niners Fan in CT]

I'm not one of these bloody thirsty type of guys but Wargames without the possibility of blood is not intriguing to me.

[The Green Meanie]

No, they'd be saying "why did you think Show is a good guy? When he left he was a bad guy and nothing has happened to make him a good guy"

 

 

He's no longer racist?

[Charlie M.]

Could Flair be trusted if they wanted him to show up on Raw to support Daniel Bryan, turn on him at the PPV to cost him the title, then cut a promo on the following Monday in which he name-drops Denny Brown and Ricky Morton while continuing the theme that the WWE braintrust doesn't think Daniel Bryan is qualified to be the face of the company?  Maybe he can also say that he is taking the figure-four back from the unworthy Miz and teaching it to a random Shield guy with instructions that the Shield is supposed to beat down the Miz and put him in the hold if he tries to use the figure-four again.  Bringing in Flair for a couple of weeks probably sounds more doable than Batista returning.

 

If they did that and also had Flair eventually suggest that HHH use a Wargames match to teach Daniel Bryan and friends a lesson, would fans be split over rejoicing about the return of Wargames and being nit-picking continuity nerds who want to point out that Flair is something like 1-16 in his career in WarGames matches so it would be stupid for him to think that is a good idea?

 

Flair should just randomly walk through backstage segments chopping people and talking about Wahoo.

[MGFanJay]

I feel robbed that they are in Vegas for Smackdown rather than Raw.  HHH blatantly rigging Raw Roulette could be a fun story.

"Coal Miner's Glove match"...just kidding! It's now a Daniel Bryan pinata on a pole match!

[The Damn Yeti]

I want to watch wrestling with Gregg.