DangerMark

Yeah, don't skip too far because the guy doing 90% of the bleeding is probably unconscious in the dressing room by the end, and it didn't look like Pierroth was getting carried out by legit medical professionals.

Not even the highest score they've chased against India in the last decade.

Why would they get rid of the only team that's got anyone I've actually heard of on it?

I don't have a clue who more than 3 people in that match were, but it was exactly what I wanted with my morning coffee.

I got it, even if no-one else did.

He was actually going nowhere at the time.

Based on the ESPN report, he couldn't have been less persuasive or less well informed than the Eagles' owner. Perhaps players or ex players are not the best placed to know what's best for players but if there's a group of people less interested in such things, it would be the owners.

That's only marginally better. Says Mark, who prefers "that fucken Philly play" or "some Ol' Timey Football"

Can we at least ban that stupid name for it?

Why they banned declarations when teams can just do that, I do not know.

He even has the family name for wrestling, it's perfect.

You guys are not selling this jalopy to me.

So called "smart" penalties are, to me, one of the most irritating things in sport and a sure sign that deliberately cheating is not being punished hard enough. Automatic scores if a foul stops a sure-fire score, please and thank you.

So, back up money, for an above average rusher; backing up an injury risk mobile guy. I really don't hate that for them.

Depending on the money, I don't hate that for them.