NintendoLogic

It wouldn't surprise me if there was a beard vs. beard match in the works. That Bryan will lose, of course.

If you hurt your head in a match, don't worry. WWE has a rigorous concussion testing protocol which consists of asking you if you're OK.

Much like this PPV, it started out awesome and had an unbelievably shitty ending.

If you're like most of America and chose to watch the Patriots/Broncos game instead of this PPV, go out of your way to watch the 5-on-5. I have it as my #2 WWE MOTY.

I thought they were going to punish Kane by putting him against Show but I think they're saving that for a more meaningful time. Yeah, Kane/Big Show isn't something you can just give away without any thought.

I liked it when Ambrose tried to get some dap and Rowan left him hanging.

Breaking up a pin or tag more than twice is a DQ. Not if WWE doesn't want it to be. Anyway, the AJ/Vickie segment left a bad taste in my mouth because it looked to me like it was a rib on AJ for collapsing on the European tour. And yes, Dolph and Sandow beating the hell out of each other while the commentators were yukking it up was quite surreal.

Would it be churlish of me to ask why heels don't just bum rush the apron every time the FIP tries to tag out?

I wonder what happens if you enter the promo code REGAL at WWEShop.

This is worse than that Summerslam thread that degenerated into a DBZ discussion.

If Taker/HHH is the epitome of WWE main event style, then WWE main event style is shit.

what As for Cena/Lesnar, I can't even watch that match anymore. The gaps in logic are just too much for me to overlook. They have to stop the match when someone gets cut but not when the referee gets knocked out? Seriously?

Punk/Lesnar is the best match of at least the past five years. I guess even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

Because matches of the caliber of Punk/Lesnar make it worth it. I'm not really bothered by how the storyline worked out, but I am somewhat annoyed that the people who got indignant whenever someone suggested that it wouldn't have a satisfying payoff won't cop to being wrong.

Optimism is not the same thing as going out of your way to ignore the red flags staring you in the face. Especially when it happens literally every single year. But you already knew that.

I know it's not a popular opinion to have on-line but this is pretty much exactly how I feel. If Rick Rude wasn't good enough to be on top, then I don't see it in Daniel Bryan. I don't care how many people in the crowd chant "Yes!" I loved Mr. Perfect. He did fine in the midcard. Is it really some big catastrophe if Daniel Bryan isn't WWE Champion & carrying the banner of the company? Ricky Steamboat was never WWE Champion. Jake Roberts wasn't either. Different times, different eras, I know...but there's a lot more to it than just workrate. I mean, compared to like The Miz? Yeah, Daniel Bryan would be a good fit. Daniel Bryan is a helluva worker. No one when they were watching him back in Ring of Honor in 2005ish thought that one day he'd be in the main event of a WWE Summerslam, wrestling for the WWE title in a Hell in a Cell match that featured both Shawn Michaels & Triple H. That's insane. Now people are complaining that he's not the top dog in the biggest wrestling company in the world when he's like 5'7", 180lbs? C'mon, man. He's more famous that he has ever been, he's making bank & he marrying a Bella twin. He's doing pretty fucking OK. We'll never really know if Bryan could have been that guy because they blew it so horribly. He was getting crowd reactions that over the last 15 years are rivaled by only Steve Austin and Jeff Hardy (who could have been THE GUY if he wasn't such a fuck up) but they booked him to look like a complete dumbshit week after week. And week after week this thread was filled with "just wait and see where it goes" posts. Well where it's gone is he's back in the mid-card "where he belongs" and you're now being asked to spend $50 for a BIG SHOW VS. RANDY ORTON main event. Maybe everything the WWE reportedly believes is right and Bryan isn't big enough to be a top guy, but maybe they screwed the pooch with every single thing they did after Summerslam and shot themselves in the foot before they ever got to find out what star potential Bryan really has. Yeah, it's pretty interesting how all the folks who kept insisting that the Bryan storyline wasn't going off the rails and WWE wouldn't fuck up his push have been conspicuously silent lately.

It seems that my birthday (November 21) has quite the athletic pedigree. Check out this list of luminaries: Sid Luckman Stan Musial Earl "The Pearl" Monroe Troy Aikman Ken Griffey Jr. The Bella Twins Oh, and some guy named Voltaire.

I'll be old enough to run for President in 2016.

The invocation of the Board of Directors is an unmistakable sign that a storyline is collapsing under its own weight. It's the Ted McGinley of WWE plot devices.

I forgot to mention how useless Swagger was in the Rhodes tag. Goldust and Cesaro had the ref distracted for like ten seconds and he stood on the apron like a doofus and did nothing. Dutch must've been blowing a gasket inside.

Savage would win because everyone else's bid is too high.

Also, the SNES Contra and Castlevania games blow the Genesis ones out of the water. Anyway, for top ten, I've got Bret at #1, and then Shawn, Austin, Vader, Foley, Eddy, Rey, Owen, Dustin, and Voldemort in no particular order.

The Self-Destruction of Jeff Jarrett?

Kane will end up being the spokesman for Zebetarianism.

I was more disappointed by him not knowing that tricep isn't a word. That's not living the gimmick.