Jump to content
DVDVR Message Board

Technico Support

Members
  • Posts

    11,735
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    144

Posts posted by Technico Support

  1. Great point.  I also think he just can't help but become Saul.  He's a con artist through and through and nothing is going to change that.  He can't help but take the short cut, con a mark, etc.  Even when he doesn't need to do it, he does because he likes it. 

     

    I made a comment a while back that the "trip to Cicero" montage was analogous to something you'd see in a movie about drugs, where we'd get a montage of a binge as the addict falls off the wagon.  In a way, BCS is an addiction metaphor.  Jimmy knows he can and should go straight but there's something so irresistible for him about pulling a con instead.

    • Like 1
  2. You just KNOW Vince laid out that sequence himself.  HE STEALS HIS UNDERWEAR PAL!  GOD DAMMIT THAT'S FUNNY!  Only standards and practices kept those drawers from having skid marks, bank on that.

     

    And that reminds me...what other wrestling moves have disappeared from regular use like the atomic drop has?  I haven't seen an atomic drop in forever.

    • Like 1
  3. I swear to God, Stephanie is thicker and more mannish every time I see her.  She has a wider back than half the guys in NXT.  Remember that Spider Man plotline where it turned out his radioactive semen slowly killed Mary Jane?  It's like that except HHH's  spunk, forever altered by years of PED use, is turning Steph into Brian Cage.

    • Like 4
  4. "Callihan's run on the indies objectively sucked?"

     

    According to whom? 

     

    And you still haven't justified "Sami sucked in NXT and went on to have good matches in the indies which means the indies suck."

     

    Nobody is saying he's the best wrestler in the world.  We're just being more reasonable than you.  You're seriously projecting a lot of things on people you disagree with and wrestlers you dislike while also making shit up out of thin air and ignoring any facts that don't work for you. 

     

    You need to separate "this is something I personally don't enjoy" from "GAAAHHHH THIS THING IS OBJECTIVELY AWFUL."  For example, I don't like Nakamura's schtick but I realize that, since a lot of people recognize him as a great wrester, then maybe this is not objective and he's just a guy I don't enjoy.  I'm not going to argue with anyone that he's a bad wrestler because that would be incorrect.

     

    This argument has ceased being mildly amusing and is entering "banging my head on the wall" territory.

×
×
  • Create New...