Jump to content
DVDVR Message Board

Wyld Samurai

Members
  • Posts

    3,053
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Wyld Samurai

  1. On 5/5/2016 at 6:30 AM, Serious Darius Bagfelt said:

    I dont know if it is bullshit or not but one of the recordings found is a collaboration with Bob Mould called Bockwinkel.

    Not only that, but it's a punk album called BOCKWINKEL.

  2. 3 hours ago, AxB said:

    Fine in theory, but how many guys who leave to come back actually come back? The only guys who've gone and come back in the last few years are the Duds, Goldust and Gallows (Umaga was ages ago). Whereas MVP left to come back and never returned, Lashley never came back, Mr Kennedy never came back, Drew Galloway's not back, Chris Masters isn't back, Mike Knox isn't back...

    Those guys ain't family. 

    In all seriousness - one of the worst things to come from the WWE being the only game in town is that acts can't keep their characters fresh nor can mature as a performer. Letting them go to work the indy and Japan circuit is only beneficial to their own growth.

  3. 9 hours ago, JonnyLaw said:

    First, I'm not saying that is my argument, but the one Ryback seems to be making. That said, playing devil's Ryback's advocate...

    Ryback's contention is that the main event guys are main event guys, and thus have value as main event guys, because the company decides they're main event guys.  Ryback's current value was damaged because the company booked him to lose a majority of his matches on PPV and booked him in Pre-Show matches.  Wrestlers' values are impacted by how they're portrayed on TV, so basing their compensation on that (in Ryback's mind a product of the company's whims) and not on how well they do their jobs, doesn't seem to make sense.  Cena should probably be considered an outlier, but Slater (or Ryback) could be just as productive and valuable as guys like Ziggler, Kane, and Ambrose given the right push.

    Essentially, if what you're paid is contingent on your value to the company, and the company, through creative, controls your value, there is little room to negotiate contracts and the WWE controls the marketplace.  Ryback presumably wants to be paid closer to what he could be worth to the company; WWE (understandably) wants to pay him based on what he is worth to them now.

     

    Ryback stated that guys should be paid for their merchandise.  It is the base pay that he thinks should more equal.

    I absolutely agree with Ryback on that. It is up to the individual to get themselves over. 

  4. 5 minutes ago, EVA said:

    You know you're a good seller when you momentarily turn into a vegetable at ringside and your opponent just thinks you're selling.

    Enzo pretty much is a FIP whenever he's tagged in.

  5. I like Nattie. She sold like a champ. It was odd to see Flair so inanimated.

    Charlotte's moonsault was just gorgeous.

    Bret... amazing to see him.

    But could have at least cheered or clapped or work the crowd a little for Nattie?

    • Like 1
  6. 40 minutes ago, Curt McGirt said:

    This talk made me go back to the Von Erich's ranch segment, which is still funny, and I proceeded to the Sunshine vs. Precious feud which Sunshine just slays. She gets on the mic and blows everyone out of the water (and btw, she is about ten times hotter than Jimmy's actual wife). 

     

    You gotta love her talking about "the tapes", "the medical records", "I did things for you that I wouldn't have ever done"; makes Garvin look super sleazy because your gears start turning about what the tapes and the things are -- likely of a sexual nature. 

    EDIT: Oh yeah, this stuff also aired on a Christian network! The '80s were a different time...

    Thank you so much! I haven't seen Garvin at the Von Erich Ranch in almost 20 years and I forgot how golden it was. Jimmy was just fantsstic...

     

    And man, those Von Erich's were dicks.

    • Like 3
  7. 5 hours ago, Cristobal said:

    I saw that, and while I have all the respect in the world for Arn (and everyone at that table), I think that was an old-timer talking about how much tougher they were back in the old days and two other old-timers agreeing with him. I don't know a fraction of what Arn's forgotten about wrestling, but I cannot believe that wrestling seven days a week keeps you "in ring shape" better than working five.

    I think the difference between wrestling now and 40 years ago is that it's a crapton more high-impact now. If wrestlers today try to spend as much time working holds as they did back then, they'd get "boring" chants, or crowds sitting on their hands.

    I think there's an element of truth... but I also think the injuries also comes from the fact that few in the current product don't know how to tell a story anymore, go 100 mph in a match and using high risk spots to get over, spend all their time in the gym getting the sexy body which leads to over training injuries. 

×
×
  • Create New...