Jump to content
DVDVR Message Board

Godfrey

Members
  • Posts

    2,813
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Godfrey

  1. Taker is a good example. As the 90s went on he knew he couldn't be a zombie 24/7 so his version of kayfabe was that he was a wrestler so into his character that even he didn't know what was real and what wasn't. It was a great limbo act

    Taker also never totally broke and only spoke about kayfabe after he was fully retired, I think that's a great template

    I disagree that staying in character makes wrestling look bad these days unless the gimmick is embarrassing in the first place. We're through the looking glass on kayfabe and everyone knows wrestlers are athletes and performers so to me it's just a matter of professionalism to not pull the curtain back. Leave a little mystery, it's more fun and it makes the matches more enjoyable. I've seen guys like MJF, Darby, Drew, Punk, and Cody ride this line very well in the past so I know it's possible

    • Like 3
  2. Moving this conversation from an AEW thread so I'm not clogging that up with my late reply:

    Kayfabe, is it necessary or even wanted in modern wrestling? To me yes, blurring the line between real and fake is what makes wrestling enjoyable. I don't see it as a con although I hear the arguments for that especially historically and from a labour perspective it's exploitive to demand a worker be working whenever they're in public. But if we treat it as a performance art then I think keeping kayfabe is part of the art of pro wrestling and maybe even most of it. This is also why certain in-ring styles don't appeal to me.

    Tbarrie says at no point do they need to believe Infinity War or Game of Thrones is real to enjoy it and I think this is where we come at it differently. I don't enjoy those movies/shows because no matter how good the stories are I find the fake worlds completely uninteresting after an hour, I watch sports because I like seeing real world action. I love pro wrestling when it rides that line (a fake sport in the real world) and the kind of kayfabe I'm talking about is a key ingredient of good pro wrestling storytelling. Again, I don't ever think the matches are real and I don't think that should be the goal, but believing that the wrestlers are really who they say they are and even hate who they say they hate helps with the immersion. When it works I think that's what makes wrestling special.

    Appreciate the perspectives so far, it's always good to hear where people are coming from. 

  3. 1 hour ago, HarryArchieGus said:

    I don't follow Konnan's pod outside of seeing the occasional 'news headline' about one his many AEW criticisms. Has anybody on his pod ever called into question his beyond terrible AAA booking?  

    Yes and he handwaves it away as people being 'haters' even though that's what he gets accused of too and he always just says it's his opinion so deal with it. Between that and the producer and Disco's racism it's a masterclass in contradictory mental gymnastics. 

    • Like 2
  4. 2 hours ago, tbarrie said:

    I'm not sure how serious you're being, but I agree that this would solve that specific problem. But I don't think it makes sense to double down on tropes and conventions designed to trick people into thinking this shit is real in an era when everybody knows it's not.

    And there are other problems caused by the ghost of kayfabe that aren't as easily solved. Like, I'm annoyed when it's not clear whether a given statement is in or out of character, but I freaking hate it when I'm left unsure whether an injury is real or part of the storyline. There's no good reason why wrestling hasn't devised a way to clearly communicate to the audience which is happening, except that back in the kayfabe era you couldn't do that, because the audience wasn't supposed to know there was a difference.

    I am being serious but I have a very different take on kayfabe. I don't think kayfabe is about tricking people into thinking wrestling matches are real, the famous quote is that you can't make people think wrestling is real but you can convince them you're real. To me kayfabe is about keeping up the reality or living the gimmick so that people don't know what's real and what isn't, and that's when you can really get the audience to buy into your show

    • Like 4
  5. Other thoughts:

    Jimmy Uso needs to not do Yeet stuff or spears ever again.

    I liked the Alexa Bliss clip, rehumanizing her character after that awful Fiend stuff. Now if she would just drop the doll...

    That one Pretty Deadly dude hit a full on Tazplex, what the hayull?!

    Considering it was three heel teams, the whole tag match went pretty well (Dawkins going full Dark Order on his ground and pound notwithstanding)

    The Kevin Owens promo was more good shit, he's nailing it

    Solo and Fatu are gonna beef, that'd be an interesting Mania match. People are already chanting for Fatu so would he be the face?

  6. From what was being said here, the YouTube edit wasn't doing the Rock's promo justice so I searched out the full thing. His choice to cut a face promo but as a heel then get angry at the crowd for booing was very strange, I can't tell if it's intricate character work or Dwayne's insecurities showing through. The Cody portion went on a long while and culminated in a goddam Shang Tsung threat, weird stuff but intriguing. I like some of the suggestions that have been posted of where this could go, to me it felt a little open on purpose like they decided at the last minute they were going to do something but don't have the full angle worked out yet. Part of me thinks Rock was shook up by the reaction to his promo on the Netflix debut and he's course correcting.

    "Show the picture of our moms!"

  7. Not to belabor the point BUT

    I was flippant about the Punk stuff because to really continue that discussion I would have to tear down Adam Page and I don't want to. I think he's doing great and improved quite a lot over the past year or so. My stance is while it is possible to learn through trial and error instead of taking advice, that doesn't mean the Hangman of yesteryear couldn't have used a few tips that would have got him here sooner. And all of their problems came out of Page going rogue on a live in-ring promo with Punk because of locker room misinformation so I'm not sure who was more unprofessional there (that or Punk's 'coward shit' promo). Anyway, Page rules, Punk rules, wrestling rules. That's where I'm at

  8. The opening tag was posted (clipped to the last half), watching for my boy Fletcher after I heard he and Ospreay are headed for a cage

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGl8lmwv_98&ab_channel=AllEliteWrestling

    What I saw was a pretty good sprint! Still think Kyle is a huge star developing before our eyes, Takeshita too although I think he could be more intense (for lack of a better term). Some downsides, the poison rana botch showed why that move should be used more sparingly and Ospreay's cutter off the top was a little loose for my liking too. I thought Omega was not on his game in this one, although that may be part of the story since Ospreay was clearly running the team and saving the day. Both of the Dream Team seem pretty one note in the ring right now imo but I didn't see the first part of the match. Callis is so bad, he didn't know what Ospreay was doing breaking up a pin? Is he forgetting what wrestling is? Although he broke out the same "No, no, no, no!" as when he got tackled in AAA, nice unintentional callback. Clip didn't include why Ospreay and Fletcher need a cage now but I'll tune in for that one for sure.

    • Like 2
  9. Agree with you both, with Paul's abilities and only one foot in the business he's more of an attraction than anything approaching a great wrestler. If you take promos, character-work, and heat into your definition of how good a wrestler is he's miles ahead of other prospects from living his whole life dialing his personality up to 11 and being a real-life heel. One thing I judge a wrestler by is how well they can cover mistakes, I think the best wrestlers can screw up a lot in a match and the crowd never realizes it. On that level, Paul isn't very good but gets better all the time. But you never know, at any time he could box his brother, get his bell rung, and decide he's done taking bumps

  10. I like to think Starks would have found notoriety anyway, the idea that without AEW these people would be nowhere is non-starter for me. Mexico and Japan exist, the indies exist, TNA exists and is getting better, NWA isn't very good but maybe that means Ricky would have stuck out as more talented. You never know how someone will break out

    • Like 1
  11. There was one guy who immediately caused the ratings to go up when he arrived, although pretty sure if you check the history Dynamite was already in ascendance before he got there and it was not a lasting bump for one reason or another. I agree at this point it's more about putting on consistently good shows and building good will than anyone popping a rating, I can see where the expectation and hope comes from though

×
×
  • Create New...