Jump to content
DVDVR Message Board

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, Dewar said:

Mercedes wins a #1 contenders match instead of a interim title match, and then wins the belt from Deonna. There's very little point in making someone an interim champion for 33 days.

He booked two needless interim champion angles, and now that he needs to book another interim champion angle because of Punk's legitimate injury, it gets met with "fuck, not again" from some fans.

Alternatively, it’s conditioned the fans to expect and understand it. 

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Matt D said:

Alternatively, it’s conditioned the fans to expect and understand it. 

Yeah, I don't watch MMA so the concept of an interim champion has been new to me, and I like how they're going about it.

  • Like 6
Posted

Boxing has had interim champions for decades. The idea of World Champion, Super World Champion and Champion Emeritus is more recent bollocks.

Posted
12 hours ago, Belgian_Waffle said:

Sort of a joke question but actually also seriously what do title histories for these interim titles end up looking like as the years go by? Like will this interim world title have a standalone history or is it like the next time the champ gets hurt and they declare a new interim champ that interim champ will be the "second" person to hold the interim belt and the title history will show the interim title as having been vacant since the previous unification with the actual world title? Could we potentially have an AEW figure who's won the interim title a bunch of times but never the world title, kind of akin to Goto with all his tournament wins but no IWGP?

generally the interim title is more of a footnote in the main title lineage. it's been pretty rare in MMA/UFC where an interim title stands on its own or has multiple consecutive champs, although that could happen.

yes, you could have someone be a 3x Interim champ but never become main champ. generally, that person would be announced as "former 3x interim champion" or whatever. if they would later win the big one  the mention of being a former interim champ largely goes away.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 6/4/2022 at 8:41 AM, Tarheel Moneghetti said:

Lol at the ref stopping the count to watch Penta do the sunset flip powerbomb.

I mean, there is another combatant making contact with someone attempting a pin. I feel like that's a pretty good reason not to count, even though your point is totally valid.

Posted

For to two teams I can be kinda cold on I enjoyed the opener. Both of them can really play to their strengths in these sprints. Although that's the fourth or fifth time I've seen some variation of that finish involving Penta, Minor annoyance that The Bucks get a tv match in The Inland Empire but Scorpio didn't get a match in the forum only a pretaped promo. TK must be desperate to keep him heel.

Everything else was solid to good.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, twiztor said:

generally the interim title is more of a footnote in the main title lineage. it's been pretty rare in MMA/UFC where an interim title stands on its own or has multiple consecutive champs, although that could happen.

yes, you could have someone be a 3x Interim champ but never become main champ. generally, that person would be announced as "former 3x interim champion" or whatever. if they would later win the big one  the mention of being a former interim champ largely goes away.

So in that world an “Interim” but never main would be like holding a secondary belt? Like they wouldn’t be announced ever as champion but asterisked as interim?

Posted
1 hour ago, Octopus said:

So in that world an “Interim” but never main would be like holding a secondary belt? Like they wouldn’t be announced ever as champion but asterisked as interim?

well yes, but in mma there are no secondary titles. so an interim title is more like a "1B", while the IC/US/TNT title is the clear #2.

as far as interim pro wrestling titles, Coach Tony can pretty much set the precedence with this run. since i'm currently watching 1994 WCW, it's not unlike Rick Rude being the "WCW International World Champion". he was technically a world champ, but never presented as THE world champ.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, twiztor said:

I'm currently watching 1994 WCW, it's not unlike Rick Rude being the "WCW International World Champion". he was technically a world champ, but never presented as THE world champ.

WCW was holding it down in those days where the two most hated heels in the company (Rude and Vader) were also dominating the singles title picture. 

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...