Jump to content
DVDVR Message Board

August 2021 Wrestling Discussion


Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, Stefanie the Human said:

Still could have been. A lot of gay men brag about their enjoyment of that sort of thing in an attempt to pass for straight. Or he could be bi. *shrug*

It's sort of like how I used to pretend to really be into stereotypically masculine tropes to throw people off my actual interests, back when I didn't think I was really a woman since I didn't know being trans was a thing. (And, subsequently, when I did know it was a thing, I didn't know it was a thing I could be.)

If The Rock's character turned out to be gay, it would actually make a whole lot of sense.  He was so over the top with the facial expressions and gestures that he wouldn't really have to tweak the character all that much if they made that change.  Speaking as an outsider, I don't believe that gay people don't really spend that much time trying to act gay.  Unless they are going to have same sex couples on screen, I don't think it ever really needs to be mentioned.  It would be different if every character had a on-screen significant other, but it rarely comes up for any character gay, straight, or otherwise.  Seriously, Shayna Baszler, Sonya Deville, Dakota Kai, are all lesbian women, and as far as I know so are their characters.  It doesn't matter if they ever bring it up on screen.  Being straight, gay, bi, or trans isn't really a performative thing, it's something you can be without ever really saying or doing anything different.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like we're minimizing the potential of a certain kind of gimmick based on the fact that prior gay gimmicks were played by and booked by people who had no clue. There are lots of gay people who embrace and feel comfortable expressing the more flamboyant and evocative side of the culture. There's nothing wrong with big, performative queerness if it's something you personally vibe with, Effy and Sonny Kiss being the first two examples in wrestling that come to mind. My bigger worry is that Vince + Co. prefer their homosexuals flaming in the worst way and lack a track record that leads me to believe they could present that kind of storyline tastefully.

Stan Hansen comes out and tells you he's got to feed his big, fat husband, then we've made progress.

Edited by John E. Dynamite
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jimbo_Tsuruta

If Vince gave the green light for an openly gay character the whole shambles would be as subtle/tasteful as Adrian Street on PCP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Stefanie Without Stefanie
12 minutes ago, supremebve said:

Speaking as an outsider, I don't believe that gay people don't really spend that much time trying to act gay.  Unless they are going to have same sex couples on screen, I don't think it ever really needs to be mentioned.  It would be different if every character had a on-screen significant other, but it rarely comes up for any character gay, straight, or otherwise.

This is really the point I've been making. Like... I don't need to try and act queer/trans. I just am that way, so literally everything I do is "acting queer/trans". There's no cookie cutter definition of what it means to be LGBTQ because it encompasses a lot of people. Let's not act like femmes and bears would appear and act the same even though they exist under the same umbrella.

(Since I check two boxes on that LGBTQ initialism, does my opinion count twice? That just feels like gaming the system. Uh... moving on.) 

But yeah, that's really my whole point about having LGBTQ characters. It's better to just hire LGBTQ people and let them perform to the best of their capabilities, rather than say "hey, we're going to have you portray someone that's LGBTQ, dial it up to 11 on this list of tropes that cis and hetero people expect" to someone who may not fully grasp what it means. Unfortunately, far too many people think that having LGBTQ representation means either having someone act up to those tropes, or simply having the person exist and expecting their gender or sexuality to be the crux of their character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, John E. Dynamite said:

Stan Hansen comes out and tells you he's got to feed his big, fat husband, then we've made progress.

I feel between the way Stan Hansen was dressed in No Holds Barred and the teeny wangers line, Vince probably felt he was already half way there in his warped mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, John E. Dynamite said:

Stan Hansen comes out and tells you he's got to feed his big, fat husband, then we've made progress.

Mike Parrow is 6'4" and 295 lbs, so WWE could totally sign him. He might still be under 30 years old - turned pro in 2010 but could have been a teenager at the time. But he'd be a good signing for WWE anyway.

I wouldn't say his husband was a fat guy exactly, but he is a decently sized dude.

Parrow_wedding_1.0.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to cagematch, he's 39. I'd love for him to get a bigger outlet, he was in 2 of my favourite matches this year: the Last Daddy Standing match against Effy and the death match against Dimitri Alexandrov.

I haven't watched the show since it moved to Fite, but I feel like the NWA really dropped the ball with him and Odinson. I'd read the results and it seemed like they were always losing. For such a thin roster, they really should be dominating champs

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we really thinking there's any chance a guy whose company, in the year of our lord 2021 is booking a Asian Dragon Lady and an African running around with a spear, is able to book a tasteful homosexual gimmick?  LOOOOL zero percent chance, friends.

The absolute best they can do is hint around a gay wrestler's sexuality while removing anything overt, like they did with Jake Atlas.  Which is a somewhat offensive way of having it both ways that satisfies nobody.

Edited by Technico Support
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watching the 2 WWE 24 on WrestleMania in Tampa was pretty much same old.   Apparently the strategy on these 24 PPV show recaps is too talk more about the wrestler's career and less on the actual event.    They talk about the weather issue on both days but not as much as I hoped for.  The thing that really surprised me was that apparently there was so much rain on the 2nd night that rather big bubbles formed on the top of the tarp above the ring.   If those things hit a strong breeze or a hard rain and popped, it would have made the bloodbath on Smackdown look like getting hit was a glass of water.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, hammerva said:

So according to many sources, the WWE is out of the building your future on indie wrestling guys game and creating their own stars.    I am sure that will have no impact on their product in about 5 years.  

 

On We Watch Wrestling, they compared this to Lorne Michaels deciding SNL should no longer hire up and coming experienced comedians and instead will start hiring good looking people and teach them how to be funny.

Edited by Technico Support
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Zimbra said:

Studio 60 is a great parallel for the WWE because it had a talented cast that was undercut by absolutely dogshit writing.

I knew that show was screwed as soon as they decided to show the “sketches”. The whole premise was that these two guys were brilliant comedy writers, and then you see their output and it’s not the least bit funny. 
 

30 Rock got that right by just going with the premise that the show was terrible. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrestling Observer says the deal with Brock was a last-minute thing to appease Fox.  Apparently, the network thinks SDL needs star power to replace John Cena.  Becky going to SDL is also for Fox's benefit.

Meltzer also said Fox is unhappy CM Punk showed up on AEW.  The network feels Vince should have thrown money at Punk to prevent that from happening.  

I'm legit curious what amount Punk would have demanded to sign with WWE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Eoae said:

Meltzer also said Fox is unhappy CM Punk showed up on AEW.  The network feels Vince should have thrown money at Punk to prevent that 

Being mad at WWE for not signing CM Punk is like my mom being mad at Rihanna for not dating me. Why the hell would anyone in their right mind expect that to happen?

  • Haha 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think, at minimum, he would have demanded a degree of creative control that they never would have given him plus fuck you money.

But I don't think it was a realistic possibility at any number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Zimbra said:

I think, at minimum, he would have demanded a degree of creative control that they never would have given him plus fuck you money.

But I don't think it was a realistic possibility at any number.

He's gone on the record multiple times about how he felt that WWE was detrimental to him and his physical, emotional, and mental well being. He's never going to work for them, it's completely out of the question. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, supremebve said:

Being mad at WWE for not signing CM Punk is like my mom being mad at Rihanna for not dating me. Why the hell would anyone in their right mind expect that to happen?

Highly likely that the FOX execs in question have no idea of the level of animosity Punk has for WWE and thinks he’s just another old star who could be bought for the right price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, supremebve said:

Being mad at WWE for not signing CM Punk is like my mom being mad at Rihanna for not dating me. Why the hell would anyone in their right mind expect that to happen?

This. And even the needing talent to replace Cena is some entitled bullshit! He was there for a month which was a total bonus at this point and they want to be compensated after things return to normal? I know they paid way too much for the show, but they ought to know by now the level of talent that they are likely to have?

And about that Rihanna thing, would it go something like this: "My Supremebve is such a good boy! I can't believe you think you are too good for him! Also, I think you should wear more clothing on your videos and your last two albums were somewhat overrated!"

Edited by Shartnado
That Rihanna thing. ..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, supremebve said:

He's gone on the record multiple times about how he felt that WWE was detrimental to him and his physical, emotional, and mental well being. He's never going to work for them, it's completely out of the question. 

A lot of people say that.  Then they sign on the dotted line when the other party meets their price.  Punk seems like he might be a true believer, so to speak, but I'm cynical enough to think he could have reached a deal if Vince had made the right offer.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shartnado said:

This. And even the needing talent to replace Cena is some entitled bullshit! He was there for a month which was a total bonus at this point and they want to be compensated after things return to normal? I know they paid way too much for the show, but they ought to know by now the level of talent that they are likely to have?

I partly agree, but, even if it is "entitled" bullshit, it worked.  Fox squawked and Vince jumped and produced Brock.  Why shouldn't the network demand more and bigger stars from Vince if they think it will work.  

As much as people blame Vince for every little decision, Vince is way to indebted to the tv networks.  When push comes to shove, the networks have been able to call their shots for awhile now.

Besides, Dave Meltzer has been saying for awhile now that the long-term plan for Brock was Roman at WrestleMania 2023.  As bad as this company is at long-term planning, there was probably no realistic chance they'd be able to hold off for a year and a half for that match.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...