supremebve Posted March 21 Posted March 21 6 minutes ago, Curt McGirt said: Having been a victim of a loose tongue and not much good sense at that age... I sympathise The timing of us saying that Jackie looked like his mom and him saying he wants to have sex with her...maybe 45 seconds. 5
No Point Stance Posted March 22 Posted March 22 14 hours ago, Curt McGirt said: 2. Jackie was not only more talented but way way hotter than frickin' Sable I never had an opinion one way or another on Jackie's 'hawtness' until recently when I watched Smoky Mountain from beginning to end. She only shows up in the last few weeks of the promotion (using the name 'Sgt. Rock' IIRC) and I was blown away by how fine she looked. So yeah, that's my Jackie thirst origin story. 1 2
The Comedian Posted March 26 Posted March 26 (edited) On 3/21/2025 at 4:30 PM, Curt McGirt said: 2. Jackie was not only more talented but way way hotter than frickin' Sable 3. This is the big one: I actually like Randy Orton now. It isn't like he aged like fine wine or anything, but he's doing the grizzled veteran thing just fine. He's got sympathy from his injuries, he can still do the crazy thing, he's over as hell after all these years, I guess I've just come around on the prick. 2. And it's not even close. Sable is what I've always called a "blah blonde". Literally nothing interesting to her. A walking mannequin. Hef's type. Not knocking all blondes. But compare Sable to the sublime cuteness of a Stacy Kiebler or the alluring exotic quality of a Trish Stratus. Sable's got nothing going on there. 3. To me, Randy is at his best in hoss matches. His runs with guys like Barrett and Sheamus were great. I wouldn't mind seeing him in a series with Gunther... Edited March 26 by The Comedian Goddamn predictive text 2
supremebve Posted March 26 Posted March 26 43 minutes ago, The Comedian said: 2. And it's not even close. Sable is what I've always called a "blah blonde". Literally nothing interesting to her. A walking mannequin. Hef's type. Not knocking all blondes. But compare Sable to the sublime cuteness of a Stacy Kiebler or the alluring exotic quality of a Trish Stratus. Sable's got nothing going on there. There is a certain very very very famous singer who I feel the same way about. With that said, I feel like I can tell a lot about a person's personality based purely on how good looking they find Sable. If I had the resources, I'd do a poll and put it in a scatter chart, and I'm pretty sure my theory would be statistically significant. 1
Technico Support Posted March 26 Posted March 26 (edited) 57 minutes ago, supremebve said: If I had the resources, I'd do a poll and put it in a scatter chart, and I'm pretty sure my theory would be statistically significant. supremebve presents an in-depth study: "Basic Bitches and the Simps Who Love Them" Edited March 26 by Technico Support 1 7
supremebve Posted March 26 Posted March 26 30 minutes ago, Technico Support said: supremebve presents an in-depth study: "Basic Bitches and the Simps Who Love Them" LOL. My assumption doesn't necessarily think these dudes are simps, but much more about how they define masculinity and other social type things. Not saying they aren't simps, but I'm much more interested in who these people are in categories that don't necessarily have anything to do with how they interact with women in general. I'm pretty sure it would break down very interestingly across racial/culture lines. For what it's worth, I'm a black dude who finds her to be attractive, but I'd look around my side of the scatterplot and wonder where the fuck I went wrong. 2 1
odessasteps Posted March 26 Posted March 26 I'd say Sable is also reminiscent of a type popular in late 90s culture... pam. anderson, Jenny McCArthy, Jenna Jameson. Arguably the very stereotypical Barbie Doll look. 4
The Comedian Posted March 26 Posted March 26 1 hour ago, odessasteps said: I'd say Sable is also reminiscent of a type popular in late 90s culture... pam. anderson, Jenny McCArthy, Jenna Jameson. Arguably the very stereotypical Barbie Doll look. You hit the nail on the head there. Like, I thought Pam was legit the least attractive woman on V.I.P. Natalie Raitano tho... 3
supremebve Posted March 27 Posted March 27 2 hours ago, odessasteps said: I'd say Sable is also reminiscent of a type popular in late 90s culture... pam. anderson, Jenny McCArthy, Jenna Jameson. Arguably the very stereotypical Barbie Doll look. Nobody has quite reached the point I'm trying to make, but this is very close. She looks like the type of woman a man who is much too interested in other people's opinions would think is attractive, not necessarily because he thinks she's attractive, but because he thinks the people he'd like to impress would think she's attractive. If you lined up all the wives of Fortune 500 companies, I bet you'd find a lot of women who look a lot like Sable. She's essentially a human Mercedes. It's the car you buy once you make x amount of dollars so that everyone knows you make x amount of dollars. It's kind of like how almost every contestant in the Miss America pageant looks like they could be related. They aren't necessarily trying to look their best; they're trying to look like what America thinks looks the best, and that's not really the same thing. 4 1
odessasteps Posted March 27 Posted March 27 Trophy wives. also, generally speaking, look at how many of the PGA wives have a similar look/aesthetic.
Nice Guy Eddie Posted March 27 Posted March 27 I never thought Sable was that attractive, especially not when compared to Tammy Stych at the time. 2 1
BloodyChamp Posted March 27 Posted March 27 This is an interesting conversation that I’m a little scared to touch lol! Sable wasn’t shit, yet she was the woman who drove me the most nuts if that makes any sense. Same goes for Pamela. There was a very well done Vince McMahon promo that talked about this that seems bad now obviously but the truth is it was great. Jenny and Jenna atleast had some of their own personal unique features in their face, and elsewhere when they were almost what you’d call thick. 1
supremebve Posted March 27 Posted March 27 11 hours ago, BloodyChamp said: This is an interesting conversation that I’m a little scared to touch lol! Sable wasn’t shit, yet she was the woman who drove me the most nuts if that makes any sense. Same goes for Pamela. There was a very well done Vince McMahon promo that talked about this that seems bad now obviously but the truth is it was great. Jenny and Jenna atleast had some of their own personal unique features in their face, and elsewhere when they were almost what you’d call thick. I don't want to live in a world where a 105 lb. woman with no cheeks is considered thick. 1 4
Nice Guy Eddie Posted March 28 Posted March 28 On 3/27/2025 at 10:44 AM, supremebve said: I don't want to live in a world where a 105 lb. woman with no cheeks is considered thick. My anaconda don't want none unless you got buns, hun. 1 1
Technico Support Posted March 28 Posted March 28 52 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said: My anaconda don't want none unless you got buns, hun. You can do side bends or sit-ups…. God dammit thanks for getting that stuck in my head 2
twiztor Posted March 28 Posted March 28 as a teenage boy during the heyday of Pam Anderson and Sable, i definitely viewed them as the epitome of "hot". times have changed and i have matured (how did that happen?) i still can appreciate their attractiveness, but i realize now they were never the end-all, be-all in that regard. i wonder how much i just considered them that hot because of their reputation of being that hot. more than i'd care to admit, methinks. 1
BobbyWhioux Posted March 28 Posted March 28 the mere fact that WWF/Vince's presentation told me I was supposed to find Sable "the hottest" immediately prompted me to have a reaction of "Nuh-uh" part of that, I'm sure, was my own adolescent thought process, both about sexuality in general ["celebrity crushes" were just a more extreme and more ridiculous version of getting worked up over the "it girls" at school that all the other boys wouldn't shut up about, who were never going to give me a second look regardless, so what was the point of my drooling like an idiot over them?] and the healthy head start I'd already gotten on being a Cynical Old Man in general. the other part of that was WWF/Vince also told me I should root for HBK over Bret and if they could be so obviously wrong and stupid about that then they were probably that obviously wrong and stupid about a bunch of other stuff, too. Including but not limited to girls. 1 1
BobbyWhioux Posted March 28 Posted March 28 Also, Sable was a babyface and I cannot overstate how much of a personal kiss of death Wrestlemania 12 was to the entire babyface side of the WWF's roster for at least the rest of 1996. Every one of them was Guilty By Association.
Cliff Hanger Posted March 29 Posted March 29 My current hottest take is that these overseas taped shows should be edited, with "nine minutes later" title cards to show how long it took the crowd to calm down enough to let people talk. I love that they're so thrilled to be there, but good lort. 4
just drew Posted March 29 Posted March 29 On 3/26/2025 at 9:39 PM, supremebve said: Nobody has quite reached the point I'm trying to make, but this is very close. She looks like the type of woman a man who is much too interested in other people's opinions would think is attractive, not necessarily because he thinks she's attractive, but because he thinks the people he'd like to impress would think she's attractive. If you lined up all the wives of Fortune 500 companies, I bet you'd find a lot of women who look a lot like Sable. She's essentially a human Mercedes. It's the car you buy once you make x amount of dollars so that everyone knows you make x amount of dollars. It's kind of like how almost every contestant in the Miss America pageant looks like they could be related. They aren't necessarily trying to look their best; they're trying to look like what America thinks looks the best, and that's not really the same thing. This is it. As a male who reached puberty during the time Pamela Anderson was a thing, she was a safe choice for when you were bullshitting with your buddies behind Mr. Ernest's General Store. (Small town life, baby.) "Oh yeah, bro, I'd totally do whatever adult act I don't understand but heard about from my friend's big brother with her." Even before you understood what you found attractive, citing someone like Pam was a surefire way to avoid ridicule. 1 1 1
Ramo2653 Posted March 29 Posted March 29 So the bar down the street from me has a bunch of TVs that usually have sports on but a few of the bartenders that work the closing shift will switch one of the TVs to the Baywatch Roku channel so it's just a loop and just seeing the typical early 90s California beach body is so jarring compared to now. 3
zendragon Posted March 29 Posted March 29 Had that happen to me with seeing a Baywatch reruns at a bar and yhea things have changed 1
supremebve Posted March 30 Posted March 30 11 hours ago, just drew said: This is it. As a male who reached puberty during the time Pamela Anderson was a thing, she was a safe choice for when you were bullshitting with your buddies behind Mr. Ernest's General Store. (Small town life, baby.) "Oh yeah, bro, I'd totally do whatever adult act I don't understand but heard about from my friend's big brother with her." Even before you understood what you found attractive, citing someone like Pam was a surefire way to avoid ridicule. Yep, but I think there are a lot of people who never actually moved past this. They learned what everyone else agreed was attractive and then just decided this narrow ass (literally and figuratively) parameter is what is attractive as a fact and never actually formed an opinion of their own on what they find attractive. The internet if full of those man vs. female videos where they ask a woman what she wants in a man and then they breakdown the percentages and the man she wants is like 1.6% of the population or some shit. The same thing goes the opposite way when we have a bunch of dudes who want a tall blonde woman with less than 10% body fat and massive breasts or a 100 lb. woman with a big ol' butt. Both are kind of like saying I want to have a tame jaguar as a pet. These things don't actually exist, but somehow we've convinced most of the population that this is not only what we want, but what we need. So, we've built a society where the men want a bunch of women who don't exist, and all the women want men who don't exist. It's just one of the many ways that we've completely lost ourselves in our own bullshit. 4 2
zendragon Posted March 31 Posted March 31 On 3/29/2025 at 5:32 PM, supremebve said: Yep, but I think there are a lot of people who never actually moved past this. They learned what everyone else agreed was attractive and then just decided this narrow ass (literally and figuratively) parameter is what is attractive as a fact and never actually formed an opinion of their own on what they find attractive. The internet if full of those man vs. female videos where they ask a woman what she wants in a man and then they breakdown the percentages and the man she wants is like 1.6% of the population or some shit. The same thing goes the opposite way when we have a bunch of dudes who want a tall blonde woman with less than 10% body fat and massive breasts or a 100 lb. woman with a big ol' butt. Both are kind of like saying I want to have a tame jaguar as a pet. These things don't actually exist, but somehow we've convinced most of the population that this is not only what we want, but what we need. So, we've built a society where the men want a bunch of women who don't exist, and all the women want men who don't exist. It's just one of the many ways that we've completely lost ourselves in our own bullshit. might say its gone from an upper body business to a lower body business 1 3
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now