J.T. Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 I am not crazy about the decision, but I respect it. I had the fight 48-47 for Dilashaw but Cruz also did just enough to win the fight. You never know what is going to impress a judge. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supremebve Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 This is the second title fight in a row where the vagueness of the judging system has made the decision unsatisfying. Judging who had the most effective striking in this fight and the Lawler/Condit fight is basically asking the judges to decide what is more effecitve dancing between ballet and tap. I'd argue that Dillashaw was less effective than Cruz, but I'd also argue that Condit was more effective than Condit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twiztor Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 I'd also argue that Condit was more effective than Condit. and that's not an easy task! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheVileOne Posted January 20, 2016 Share Posted January 20, 2016 Kevin Iole @KevinI 33m33 minutes ago The #UFCBoston ratings were big: Dillashaw-Cruz averaged 2.28 mm viewers, peaking at 2.64 mm. Prelims peaked at 1.95 and averaged 1.76 That makes this the second biggest UFC card on FS1 ever behind McGregor vs. Siver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now