Jump to content
DVDVR Message Board

Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase III Discussion


RIPPA

Recommended Posts

Question - since this is already 44 pages and technically none of the Phase III movies are out yet (plus the change in original plans with the addition on Spiderman) I want to reset

So would you all prefer moving to individual movie threads or just another catch all Phase III thread?

Not a rush yet - but I do want to have whatever in place before Civil War's official release

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, RIPPA said:

Question - since this is already 44 pages and technically none of the Phase III movies are out yet (plus the change in original plans with the addition on Spiderman) I want to reset

So would you all prefer moving to individual movie threads or just another catch all Phase III thread?

Not a rush yet - but I do want to have whatever in place before Civil War's official release

Catch all Marvel Cinematic Universe Phase Three topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, odessasteps said:

We've prob discussed thus before, but if Fox has Kang, does that also mean they have rights to Immortus and Scarlet Centurion and Rama Tut?

That would be my assumption since those characters are all tied into Kang's bio.

I would actually like to see Kang in a GoTG movie since nearly all of the classic Trek stories mix space travel with time travel.   They'd need a really good sci-fi guy helping out with the script.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, J.T. said:

James Gunn:  I'd really like to use Kang and Annihilus.  Too bad Fox owns the rights.

IIRC the FF license also includes Galactus and the Skrulls. 

Perfectly fine cosmic villainy for GoTG movies that will be languish due to legal issues.

I think I've read that the Skrulls in general is a situation like Quicksilver where both Fox and Marvel can use them. The Super Skrull character, however, belongs to Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, tbarrie said:

Kang and Rama Tut being the same person is the reason he's tied to the Fantastic Four rights, isn't it?

 

That's been my assumption, but no one has officially confirmed it.  

 

As for villains they *can* use, I'd really like to see the Church of Universal Truth but that might be too exposition-heavy (and would definitely require an Adam Warlock appearance).  I'm guessing if they can't use Annihilus, they can't use Blastarr or Burstarr either.  

 

16 hours ago, odessasteps said:

We've prob discussed thus before, but if Fox has Kang, does that also mean they have rights to Immortus and Scarlet Centurion and Rama Tut?

Scarlet Centurion might be weird, since Marcus appeared probably 20 years before he was revealed as Kang's son, and the first Centurion to appear was a Squadron villain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, J.T. said:

James Gunn:  I'd really like to use Kang and Annihilus.  Too bad Fox owns the rights.

IIRC the FF license also includes Galactus and the Skrulls. 

Perfectly fine cosmic villainy for GoTG movies that will be languish due to legal issues.

I still suspect Kang is more of a Quicksilver/Wanda situation where both can use him. If I'm being honest though I'm sort of happy Gunn can't use them. I liked the first Guardians well enough, but nothing he did in it makes me think he would use the bigger galactic characters and races well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RIPPA locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...