cool arrow Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Hey, I have learned to accept that I'm wrong to like whatever it is I like in wrestling. That seems reasonable. Yes. How dare you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cristobal Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Hey, I have learned to accept that I'm wrong to like whatever it is I like in wrestling. That seems reasonable. Have you learned that constantly repeating that talking point over and over again is boring? Irony. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Fowler Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 We want Punk is very chantable, fwiw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tromatagon Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 It sounds like we want Funk Terry doesn't need your pity 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Fowler Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Maybe it would bring back Scorp 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tromatagon Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Ok I'm all for that I fucking love that guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIPPA Posted January 31, 2014 Author Share Posted January 31, 2014 BTW - the Daniel Bryan petition was pulled because it "violated terms and services" apparently Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LooseCannon Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 BTW - the Daniel Bryan petition was pulled because it "violated terms and services" apparently You agree to only create petitions consistent with the limited purpose of the We the People platform, which is to allow individuals to petition the Administration to take action on a range of issues — to address a problem, support or oppose a proposal, or otherwise change or continue federal government policy or actions. To focus discussion, the platform is limited to a discrete set of topics, which may be adjusted over time. You agree not to create petitions that fall outside this limited purpose—for example, petitions that advertise or call for the endorsement or purchase of commercial goods or services, petitions that expressly urge the support or opposition of candidates for elected office, petitions that do not address the current or potential actions or policies of the federal government, or petitions that address a topic not included in We the People at the time the petition was created. Seems like a pretty obvious case to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nate Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 (edited) It sounds like we want Funk Terry doesn't need your pity You know what else he don't need? He ain't need no gottamn moufpiece! Sheeit! /briscoe Edited to add "Sheeit!" Edited January 31, 2014 by nate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hooks Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 I don't recall if it was here or somewhere else, but someone pointed to Punk leaving as a symptom of a larger burnout syndrome that people have been suffering since 2005 or whatever, and wondered why older stars didn't burn out like the new group was. Except, they did, they just jumped to WCW when they got burned out, took a breather, and came back to WWF a couple years later to bigger acclaim. Or they did loads and loads of cocaine to keep going and died when they reached middle age. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Spanish Waiter Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Hey, I have learned to accept that I'm wrong to like whatever it is I like in wrestling. That seems reasonable.Have you learned that constantly repeating that talking point over and over again is boring?Irony. Hypocrite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Fresh Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 BTW - the Daniel Bryan petition was pulled because it "violated terms and services" apparently You agree to only create petitions consistent with the limited purpose of the We the People platform, which is to allow individuals to petition the Administration to take action on a range of issues — to address a problem, support or oppose a proposal, or otherwise change or continue federal government policy or actions. To focus discussion, the platform is limited to a discrete set of topics, which may be adjusted over time. You agree not to create petitions that fall outside this limited purpose—for example, petitions that advertise or call for the endorsement or purchase of commercial goods or services, petitions that expressly urge the support or opposition of candidates for elected office, petitions that do not address the current or potential actions or policies of the federal government, or petitions that address a topic not included in We the People at the time the petition was created. Seems like a pretty obvious case to me. Which would be all fine and dandy if they hadn't famously responded to one about building a Death Star. We got 10 hours of this thread left, let's fight about this vigorously!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tromatagon Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LooseCannon Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 BTW - the Daniel Bryan petition was pulled because it "violated terms and services" apparently You agree to only create petitions consistent with the limited purpose of the We the People platform, which is to allow individuals to petition the Administration to take action on a range of issues — to address a problem, support or oppose a proposal, or otherwise change or continue federal government policy or actions. To focus discussion, the platform is limited to a discrete set of topics, which may be adjusted over time. You agree not to create petitions that fall outside this limited purpose—for example, petitions that advertise or call for the endorsement or purchase of commercial goods or services, petitions that expressly urge the support or opposition of candidates for elected office, petitions that do not address the current or potential actions or policies of the federal government, or petitions that address a topic not included in We the People at the time the petition was created. Seems like a pretty obvious case to me. Which would be all fine and dandy if they hadn't famously responded to one about building a Death Star. We got 10 hours of this thread left, let's fight about this vigorously!!! Ewoks > Daniel Bryan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Playa Shunna Ver 3.0 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Guys....I'm hearing faint rumblings right now. I will let you know what they are saying later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Fresh Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 BTW - the Daniel Bryan petition was pulled because it "violated terms and services" apparently You agree to only create petitions consistent with the limited purpose of the We the People platform, which is to allow individuals to petition the Administration to take action on a range of issues — to address a problem, support or oppose a proposal, or otherwise change or continue federal government policy or actions. To focus discussion, the platform is limited to a discrete set of topics, which may be adjusted over time. You agree not to create petitions that fall outside this limited purpose—for example, petitions that advertise or call for the endorsement or purchase of commercial goods or services, petitions that expressly urge the support or opposition of candidates for elected office, petitions that do not address the current or potential actions or policies of the federal government, or petitions that address a topic not included in We the People at the time the petition was created. Seems like a pretty obvious case to me.Which would be all fine and dandy if they hadn't famously responded to one about building a Death Star.We got 10 hours of this thread left, let's fight about this vigorously!!! Ewoks > Daniel Bryan http://youtu.be/9gSQg1i_q2gYour Mom > Ewoks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIPPA Posted January 31, 2014 Author Share Posted January 31, 2014 Guys....I'm hearing faint rumblings right now. I will let you know what they are saying later. Please stop that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tromatagon Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 #bowelmovement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirSmUgly Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 I don't recall if it was here or somewhere else, but someone pointed to Punk leaving as a symptom of a larger burnout syndrome that people have been suffering since 2005 or whatever, and wondered why older stars didn't burn out like the new group was. Except, they did, they just jumped to WCW when they got burned out, took a breather, and came back to WWF a couple years later to bigger acclaim. 1985 maybe. Is the U.S. Express the peak of Mike Rotunda's in-ring work? It seems like it probably might be, now that I'm thinking about it. Man, he peaked early. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Playa Shunna Ver 3.0 Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 I think Rotunda had some chops at the beginning of the Varsity Club. Barry definitely Shawn Michaelsed him in that tag team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tromatagon Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 He was never the same after he ripped his balls off on the fence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cristobal Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Which would be all fine and dandy if they hadn't famously responded to one about building a Death Star. Military hardware is absolutely the purview of the federal government. The Wrestlemania main event is not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt D Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 I think Rotunda has another underrated period at the very end of 92, but yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig H Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Regarding Austin talking about Punk, if anyone listen's to Austin's podcast, it should be plainly clear one of his biggest regrets is walking out when asked to lay down for Brock. So I'm sure this situation with Punk feels a little familiar to Austin, and Punk being one of Austin's friends, probably makes Austin want Punk to not make the same mistake. I think what I'm trying to say is I want a recreation of Austin in the bar, being talked into helping out the WWE, except this time Punk is hanging out in a comic book shop, and it takes Austin convincing Punk to come back. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yo-Yo's Roomie Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 Varsity Club Rotunda has lots of good stuff. He was very effective in that role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts