Jump to content
DVDVR Message Board

Recommended Posts

Posted

Except for the Brown fumble, Washington's offense has not been the issue in this game.   Depending on the score of this game, I wonder if Quinn is going to regret kicking that FG on the first drive instead of going for that 3rd 4th down 

Posted (edited)

Washington had them scared and another turnover 

At this point Luvu is just fucking with people.   If they keep getting penalties the ball will be snapped in the end zone 

Edited by hammerva
Posted (edited)

What in the flying fuck is Washington doing?! 

EDIT: Man, those three straight encroachments were unbelievable and all it did was make the inevitable easier. Commanders have been great but they're falling apart at the wrong time. 

Edited by NikoBaltimore
Posted
1 minute ago, BloodyChamp said:

This turn of events in a CCG could finally get the play banned though 

It's not the offenses fault,  why ban it?

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Raziel said:

It's not the offenses fault,  why ban it?

Because you're going to have someone jump over the line and do a Canadian Destroyer on the QB eventually...

Posted
Just now, dogwelder said:

Because you're going to have someone jump over the line and do a Canadian Destroyer on the QB eventually...

So we're banning QB sneaks?  We gonna ban QB designed runs next?

Posted
Just now, Raziel said:

So we're banning QB sneaks?  We gonna ban QB designed runs next?

Nah, I think just going back to not allowing runners to be pushed by teammates

Posted
Just now, dogwelder said:

Nah, I think just going back to not allowing runners to be pushed by teammates

That's not gonna stop Defenders trying to jump the snap on obvious sneak situations.

Posted
1 minute ago, Raziel said:

That's not gonna stop Defenders trying to jump the snap on obvious sneak situations.

True, but at least it wouldn't be basically just having the runner be pushed forward.

Posted
Just now, dogwelder said:

True, but at least it wouldn't be basically just having the runner be pushed forward.

So again, if the reason to ban is protecting the QB and the reasoning isn't protecting the qb...

 

And that's probably game.

Posted
2 hours ago, stuntmanc said:

I'm pulling Hurts, not only because of being from Philly, but because the national narrative towards him is weird and so directed.  The guy dost deserve nearly the amount of scrutiny he receives and people so quickly forget that while he's "limited" he outplayed Mahomes two years in the Super Bowl.  Also, rooting for Hurts means that Chris Simms will have to shut the fuck up on his weird hate fetish of Hurts.

If Mahomes, Allen, Jackson, Daniels had AJ Brown and DeVonta Smith to throw to they would put up video game numbers. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Raziel said:

So we're banning QB sneaks?  We gonna ban QB designed runs next?

Take the tush push out of football now. It's an unsportsmanlike play. Go play rugby if you just want to push dudes in a scrum.

Teams need to start laying down on top of each other to build a wall to stop it.

Posted

 

13 minutes ago, Cobra Commander said:

as a Samoan, it was either football or the WWF for Frankie Luvu, or one before the other

A post not even as serious as this about Samoans got me banned from Crazymax back in the day. Luvu is a solid dude in the middle. Barkley gave him some fits today but he gave everybody fits. 

I don’t know why they’d ban it but they talk about banning it every year. Heck maybe they’d require it instead since the league apparently loves rigged looking garbage in CCGs and SBs.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Serious Darius Bagfelt said:

If Mahomes, Allen, Jackson, Daniels had AJ Brown and DeVonta Smith to throw to they would put up video game numbers. 

I understand this but until Hurts quits winning it’s no reason to rip on him in the same league where so many other guys who lose use the same excuse. Well their homers anyway. 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, BloodyChamp said:

 

A

I don’t know why they’d ban it but they talk about banning it every year. Heck maybe they’d require it instead since the league apparently loves rigged looking garbage in CCGs and SBs.

Because people.mad their teams can't stop it or do it themselves.   Kinda like banning the shift.

  • Like 2
Posted

the Tush Push being treated as "one simple trick" to always convert in an "And 1" is sorta goofy... but it's like the whole concept of banning defensive shifts in baseball

Posted
14 minutes ago, Raziel said:

That's not gonna stop Defenders trying to jump the snap on obvious sneak situations.

Thing is, the assistance makes it all but impossible to defend. 

The Comms can make a solid case that all 3 penalties were them simply trying to defend the play. Luvu thought he had the timing and tried to jump it.  He was wrong though. 

They've overlegislated towards the Offense for years a push back in the other direction won't hurt.

Just make the penalty cause the play to end wherever the assistance happened. No loss of yardage unless the team does it repeatedly.

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...