Jump to content
DVDVR Message Board

December 2022 Wrestling Discussion


Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, GuerrillaMonsoon said:

Who?

Well, damn, I'd just scrubbed the concept of "Sid porn" out of my head, now I have "Jim Neidhart cackling his way thru a nut" as a rock to push up my mental hill.

  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FourPostMassacre said:

I like the story that HBK had a thing for Mandy and was all cool with her stuff on the site till the leaked stuff came out and Tino Sabatelli was in alot of the content so HBK got jealous and had Mandy fired. 
 

It’s so ridiculous but my disdain for HBK+WWE prefers it to the “truth”. 

I'm not giving my opinion on this one way or another.  But is this rumor really strong enough that people are believing it?  Because it reads so much like something Vince would do though who knows with Shawn anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Infinit said:

The most hilarious part of the story is that the dude who posed for Playgirl was pearl clutching about Mandy's risqué photos lol

Someone being hypocritical after finding religion isn't exactly unheard of.

5 hours ago, odessasteps said:

Surprised it wasn't Johnny Ace's job before he was fired.

I wonder if he tried to write off his onlyfans subscriptions as talent scouting expenses.

  • Like 5
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HumanChessgame said:

I wonder if he tried to write off his onlyfans subscriptions as talent scouting expenses.

Gonna guess that nobody on a fetish wrestling site actually got to work in pro wrestling after being discovered on that site (in fact, it was the other way around because of certain people featured in the Teddy Hart Peacock documentary)

WWE probably wasn't thaaaat interested in female mat wrestling back when they were hiring women who were modeling underwear.

edit: there was once a time that I thought Tessa Blanchard's biggest wrestling career advancement problem would involve her filming fetish wrestling. It turns out that Tessa had a bunch of other problems that were much more career hindering than her work on RingDivas.

Edited by Cobra Commander
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Cobra Commander said:

edit: there was once a time that I thought Tessa Blanchard's biggest wrestling career advancement problem would involve her filming fetish wrestling. 

Well, AFAIK Nyla and Jordynne have as well. Ain't stopping them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is about an OnlyFans, it's not specifically like a risque thing, that's just inevitably what it became. The site owners even tried to ban the risque stuff which backfired.

Like from what I could tell, it was basically like another form of Patreon. Influencers and freelancers offering more personalized content to their fans and customers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in light of news happening on a certain social media site... which indy worker (or washed up ex-WWE guy) is gonna get themselves suspended from Twitter so they can work that into their gimmick?

"I say things so controversial that I've been banned from Social Media"

If Beau can get news coverage every few years for having a progressive heel in Appalachia, i'm sure there'd be some bites on "I was just trying to do my job as a pro wrestler and I got censored for it!" media appearances over a cross-section of cable channels

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Candy Lee got her account banned for tweeting "I want to beat up cis people", but that was months ago and she just made a new one. MV Young has been banned like six times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Goitre said:

I'm wondering about proprietorship. Does the esteemed gentleman paying $tupid then own the footage, to do with as he pleases?

No, copyrighted material is copyrighted material. The person that even releases doesn't technically own the footage once they upload it. Now they (the uploaders)  have every right to take it down themselves per whatever agreement you agree to once you start an account, but the websites put the watermark on the video for a reason. Moreover, a good number of people who start uploading adult material behind a paywall hire services to scrub leaked material off websites with the reason being copyright violations. Most of the time, the websites agree to remove that material because someone (another website) owns that material that isn't the person who uploaded on their website. Now obviously, you can probably find stuff that was thought to have been scrubbed. However, you're going to have to dig for it.

On a much larger scale, the whole 'I bought this high priced service/content so I must own it" thing kinda played out a few years ago when the UFC started going after piracy hard. Not only did they go after the various websites, but they also went after the bars and other establishments playing UFC PPV events. Now these owners thought, "well since I purchased the PPV, it's just like when I have a few friends over and watch the fight". They ordered it, popped it on one or two big screen TVs, and charged admission to watch it. They didn't know that is basically a huge violation of UFC copyright. They were selling material they didn't own. You see...UFC made a deal with a company called Joe Hand Promotions. In order for any nightclub, bar, sports bar, high school looking for an extracurricular event, restaurant, or movie theater to get permission to show a UFC PPV, they have to go through Joe Hand Promotions (they may have a new company now for that fwiw). If they don't, that's considered piracy as if you went online and watched it for free on some website. Yes, even if you paid for it with your ESPN+ account and purchased the PPV separately.

Purchasing something doesn't mean you own the rights to it. You buy a copy of Thriller, you don't own a prized piece of Michael Jackson's publishing catalog. You just have the right to listen to it.

The whole reason why more women and men (celebrity or not) are taking to these websites is they do have the choice to set whatever price they want. Now obviously, a Toni Storm can charge more than just some cute chick who works as a sandwich artist at Subway. However, that doesn't mean the latter cannot charge a ridiculous amount for a picture of her in a two piece. These websites are basically eBay for adult content (well, that use to be Craigslist and Backpage but you get my point). You're going to get jipped, but hey, you will find a gem or two along the way.

  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watching an old Prime Time from early 92.

I had no idea that the storyline heading into the Rumble was that Hogan and Taker were given preferential drawings heading into the match (between 20 and 30). There's a throwaway line from Gorilla about why Flair wasn't given #1. 

They really should have done that part of the storyline rather than Flair just getting the luck of the draw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...