Jump to content
DVDVR Message Board

November 2022 Wrestling Discussion


Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, Matt D said:

Honestly, what probably happens is that Kerry can't figure out the notoriously insane late 80s WWF trans and ends up accidentally taking a flight to Hawaii and just ends up living there.

Then, Don Muraco sees Kerry down in Sunset Beach, trades the WWF title for a bunch of coke and just shows up on WWF tv next week with the title, claiming to have beat Kerry for it at a Hawaii house show.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Matt D said:

kerryperfectmxjnd.gif

The answer's probably Kerry.

Lord this gif makes me understand the whole "Warrior died and Kerry replaced him"

 

4 hours ago, Sublime said:

Since posting my fantasy tournament yesterday I’ve realized my true dream tournament would have Toru Yano go through Santino in the first round in a match that was a mix of comedy and them both tapping into their legit ability to throw people. Then in the second round William Regal gets to showcase all of his comedic timing and facials as he’s flummoxed at Yanos antics. And in the finals Yano and Eddie Guerrero (in full Lie, cheat and steal mode) trying to one up each other in stealing the win and set a record for most dusty finishes in one match regardless of who goes over we all win.

I still want a match where Orange Cassidy goes for the pockets so Yano does the only thing he can... shrug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Zakk_Sabbath said:

Dumb question, but do you mean other than just using Sheik in the same fashion as what actually happened in '84?

Sure but do you just bring Randy in as a Face to beat Sheik? Does that work? IMO you had a prefect storm of The Jingoistic 80's for a flag waving Hogan to beat a anti american heel. I don't know if that works for Savage. I like the idea of doing Slaughter v Sheik cause you can do all the flag waving stuff (You could even do so Slaughter v russians or some of Hogan other foes) then transition to Savage. (Could do Heel savage v Slaughter or if the fans demand it turn him face to beat the Sheik)

 

23 minutes ago, Matt D said:

d.gif

???

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, zendragon said:

???

I forget where I heard this but I did hear that Sheik got the win just because he happened to be the guy wrestling Backlund that week. The month before, Backlund was wrestling Masked Superstar. No reason why it couldn't have been him. 

Also, in looking at this, there was never a Bill Eadie vs Savage match. Or a Eadie/Savage tag. They only ever interacted in a few battle royals (including two Rumbles). Crazy to think.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Matt D said:

I forget where I heard this but I did hear that Sheik got the win just because he happened to be the guy wrestling Backlund that week. The month before, Backlund was wrestling Masked Superstar. No reason why it couldn't have been him. 

Also, in looking at this, there was never a Bill Eadie vs Savage match. Or a Eadie/Savage tag. They only ever interacted in a few battle royals (including two Rumbles). Crazy to think.

That's crazy if true. I've always looked at it as he was the prefect guy, All American boy gets beat by foreign menace and avenged by Hogan. A world where Bill Eadie is a former WWF champ. Of course this opens un another box of worms, If the Masked Superstar get a transitional reign, do we get demolition or does he just stay as MS?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, zendragon said:

Sure but do you just bring Randy in as a Face to beat Sheik?

I'm being a dumbass and forgetting Savage was a heel, that's my bad - long work day. I guess that could work - though now my thought is, why not just go Savage over Backlund directly, and cut out the transitional champ? Unless of course, your second point about the jingo babyface is mandatory - in that case, I think you simply go Backlund -> Sheik -> Sarge, keep most things equal, and get to Slaughter/Savage by WM IV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Zakk_Sabbath said:

I'm being a dumbass and forgetting Savage was a heel, that's my bad - long work day. I guess that could work - though now my thought is, why not just go Savage over Backlund directly, and cut out the transitional champ? Unless of course, your second point about the jingo babyface is mandatory - in that case, I think you simply go Backlund -> Sheik -> Sarge, keep most things equal, and get to Slaughter/Savage by WM IV.

New York was always a babyface territory so Savage as a heel isn't going to get a long reign either (and that leaves the question as who is your top babyface? I like Steamboat but to me he's the guy who works with the guy who draws the money not the guy himself) So I could see Backlund drops it to sheik, who feuds with Slaughter, who eventually wins the title and spends some time fighting the russians ect. meanwhile Savage gets built up in the IC scene. Sheik gets the belt back to put over Savage sometime around 86

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Zakk_Sabbath said:

 

 

It might be recency bias because we just watched his DSOTR episode recently, but I think there's for sure a timeline out in the multiverse somewhere where we get national treasure and pop culture icon Dr. D. 

Dr. D as a babyface would have been amazing stuff for the time period. I think you could have built Wrestlemania on a Piper/Schultz feud. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Phantom Lord said:

Dr. D as a babyface would have been amazing stuff for the time period. I think you could have built Wrestlemania on a Piper/Schultz feud. 

This is an interesting thought. If you drop 1998 Steve Austin into 1985 WWF, is he as big a star, or does the era + the territory's traditional fanbase still having a large influence on the product prevent Austin from being the star that he was thirteen years later. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SirSmellingtonofCascadia said:

This is an interesting thought. If you drop 1998 Steve Austin into 1985 WWF, is he as big a star, or does the era + the territory's traditional fanbase still having a large influence on the product prevent Austin from being the star that he was thirteen years later. 

I don't think it works in 1985. We were still in the "Hooray America! Bigger is better!" Reagan years. Hogan was a perfect storm of right place, right time, right look, right soundbites, right exposure in the mainstream to explode. Austin was the same thing in 1997-98. Both were just reflections of what was popular in America at those specific times.

 

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Log said:

I don't think it works in 1985. We were still in the "Hooray America! Bigger is better!" Reagan years. Hogan was a perfect storm of right place, right time, right look, right soundbites, right exposure in the mainstream to explode. Austin was the same thing in 1997-98. Both were just reflections of what was popular in America at those specific times.

 

This seems about right. I love the idea of Dr. D-as-Austin being a massive babyface in 1985, but it probably wouldn't have happened. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SirSmellingtonofCascadia said:

This is an interesting thought. If you drop 1998 Steve Austin into 1985 WWF, is he as big a star, or does the era + the territory's traditional fanbase still having a large influence on the product prevent Austin from being the star that he was thirteen years later. 

I see him being a heel ala Piper, probably working against Hogan or on the B tour. I don't see him getting a face run as the companies ace

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the question isn't quite accurate as Hogan left the AWA of his own accord because Verne fucked him on t-shirt money and the title run.

If Hogan goes to Japan full time, or Crockett instead, it probably delays the inevitable arrival. If he stays with Verne - it probably just means that Vince continues to actively raid the AWA post the initial poaching of Heenan, Ventura, Okerlund and Hogan instead of just passively allowing him to rot/fucking him on the TV syndication markets instead.

It's probably worth noting that Hogan wrestled his last AWA date on 14/11/83. He's working shows for Vince a month later, and is WWF champion barely two months later. New York worked around Hogan's availability and want to leave Verne, rather than Hogan being right place right time. The most likely outcome here is that the Sheik either gets a longer run with it, or he exchanges it back and forth with one of the other mentioned guys before Hogan eventually takes it maybe a year later?

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SirSmellingtonofCascadia said:

This is an interesting thought. If you drop 1998 Steve Austin into 1985 WWF, is he as big a star, or does the era + the territory's traditional fanbase still having a large influence on the product prevent Austin from being the star that he was thirteen years later. 

I think he's a lesser star, but a top heel - if he's the fully formed 'Stone Cold' character in this scenario. @Log is right - Austin probably doesn't print money like Hogan does in that era as a babyface, but he damn sure draws a shitload of big houses working against Hogan. 

I totally see where your heads at, but Schultz also wasn't around long enough for some of the truly goofy shit to come later on. There's a non-zero chance that Vince gets one listen at Austin's accents and puts him in a cowboy hat or a pair of overalls

Edit: damn, I should've refreshed the page, @zendragon and @Wyld Samurai beat me to these points by an hour, cowboy hat and all. My bad!

Edited by Zakk_Sabbath
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...