Search the Community

Okay folks, here's an interesting question, and I'm interested in where people stand on this issue. Personally, I don't think there are any right or wrong answers, merely opinions, and y'all know me well enough to know that I'm going to do whatever I please and damn the torpedoes anyway. ? Here's the deal: for years a friend of mine and I have been working on getting a complete set of the definitive weird tales of Jean Ray into print. He's been doing the heavy lifting with the actual translating since my French pretty much sucks. I've been setting things up with a publisher for the limited edition of a "Best of". Jean Ray, for uninitiated, was essentially the Belgian master of the weird tale (wish Roman still posted, so as a native Belgian, he could chime in!). Anyway, other than two rather slender and now expensive books, the vast majority of his work has never appeared in English. Thanks to Scott, that's about to change. However, as he prepared the definitive translations, he made an unpleasant discovery, Jean Ray was virulently anti-Semitic, the stuff had been edited out of the two collections that I spoke of, but he was as bad if not worse than Lovecraft. The texts are littered with references to "hook-nosed Jews, grasping money-lenders", and that sort of shit. The question is: Does one edit out the offensive stuff and preserve the reputation as a person of a guy that clearly doesn't deserve it, or do we publish the true unexpurgated texts and let the chips fall where they may? As I said, there are no absolute right or wrong answers, just answers.